Inclusive education journey: comparative insights from gifted and differently abled learners
Abstract
This study aimed to comparatively examine the educational needs of learners with disabilities (LWDs) and potentially gifted learners (PGLs) within higher education institutions, highlighting their distinct yet overlapping requirements for inclusive learning. Using a qualitative-comparative research design,
20 participants, 10 from each group, were selected through purposive sampling. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s thematic framework to identify convergent and divergent themes. Results revealed that both groups face systemic and pedagogical barriers, including rigid curricula, limited institutional support, and insufficient guidance in developing social-emotional skills. While LWDs emphasized accessibility, assistive technologies, and equitable participation, PGLs highlighted the need for enrichment, mentorship, and intellectual challenge. Despite differing emphases, both groups shared the need for inclusive policies, emotional support, and a sense of belonging. The study proposes an integrated model of inclusivity that unites adaptive pedagogy, personalized mentorship, and wellness programs under coherent institutional policies. This framework reframes inclusion from fragmented interventions toward a holistic, equity-driven approach that values diversity as a resource for learning. Findings contribute to the global discourse on inclusive education by demonstrating that authentic inclusivity in higher education emerges when accessibility and excellence are addressed through a unified, transformative educational system.
20 participants, 10 from each group, were selected through purposive sampling. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s thematic framework to identify convergent and divergent themes. Results revealed that both groups face systemic and pedagogical barriers, including rigid curricula, limited institutional support, and insufficient guidance in developing social-emotional skills. While LWDs emphasized accessibility, assistive technologies, and equitable participation, PGLs highlighted the need for enrichment, mentorship, and intellectual challenge. Despite differing emphases, both groups shared the need for inclusive policies, emotional support, and a sense of belonging. The study proposes an integrated model of inclusivity that unites adaptive pedagogy, personalized mentorship, and wellness programs under coherent institutional policies. This framework reframes inclusion from fragmented interventions toward a holistic, equity-driven approach that values diversity as a resource for learning. Findings contribute to the global discourse on inclusive education by demonstrating that authentic inclusivity in higher education emerges when accessibility and excellence are addressed through a unified, transformative educational system.
Keywords
Adaptive pedagogy; assistive technologies; inclusivity model; personalized mentorship; qualitative-comparative study; shared needs; transformative education
Full Text:
PDFDOI: http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v15i2.37782
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Ramil B. Arante, John O. Estillore
International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE)
p-ISSN: 2252-8822, e-ISSN: 2620-5440
The journal is published by Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science (IAES).

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.