Higher order thinking skills, school-based assessment and students’ mathematics achievement: Understanding mathematics teachers’ thoughts

Nurulwahida Azid


The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of incorporating Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in a School Based Assessment (SBA) on mathematics achievement among student 13 years old students. A mixed-method case study design was used to assess a sample size of 158 students and three mathematics teachers. The students’ proficiency in mathematics was determined by using the Standard Based Curriculum for Secondary Schools (KSSM) Mathematics assessment paper that was assiduously organized by incorporating HOTS questions. The students’ thoughts on the incorporation of HOTS in the SBA was obtained through one-to-one face-to-face semi-structured interviews. The quantitative findings, which were analyzed using descriptive and regression tests, showed that 11.9% of the achieved mathematics score was contributed by the incorporation of HOTS in SBA, while 7.7% was contributed by SBA mastery level in mathematics. Students’ maturity and misconceptions about math are among the challenges in implementing HOTS in SBA. The challenges in applying HOTS in SBA had a positive effect on teachers’ pedagogical approach in a sense that they could devise a new strategy for meeting the needs of students and teach topics in alternative ways.


Mathematics education Higher Order Thinking Skills Mathematics Assessment School Based Assessment Mathematic Achievement


V. Yu. Six ways continuous assessment can help students to learn, New York: Knewton, 2012.

N. N. Loretta, B. O. Ellah. Teachers practice of School-Based Assessment (SBA) techniques in Science classes, International Journal of Educational Research, vol. 142, pp. 242-251, 2015.

R. Md-Ali, A. Veloo, H. N. Krishnasamy. Implementation of school-based assessment: The experienced teachers’ thoughts, Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, vol. 9(18), pp. 72-78, 2015.

C. Davison. Views from the chalk face: English language SBA in Hong Kong. Language Assessment Quarterly, vol. 4(1), pp. 37-68, 2007.

G. T. L. Brown. School based assessment methods: Development and implementation, Journal of Assessment Paradigms, vol. 1(1), pp. 30-32, 2001.

Association of American Colleges Universities. The LEAP vision for learning outcomes, practices, impact, and employers’ views, Washington: LEAP publication, 2011.

Ministry of Education. Implementation of SBA for improvement of UPSR and PMR, Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Education Malaysia, 2012.

M. D. Miller, L. R. Linn, N. Gronlund. Measurement and assessment in teaching (11th ed.), United States, America: Pearson Education, 2013.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Curriculum and evaluation standard for school Mathematics, Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1989.

N. Hasnida. The implementation of school-based assessment system in Malaysia: A study of teacher perceptions, Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, vol. 12(9), pp. 104-117, 2016.

M. B. Aidarwati, A. G. Abu. A comparative analysis of primary and secondary school teachers in the implementation of SBA, Malaysian Journal of Research, vol. 1(1), pp. 28-36, 2013.

A. Ahmad. Pentaksiran pendidikan, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, 2010.

A. N. Mansora, S. S. Vikaraman, N. I. Medina, B. S. Alias. Managing school-based assessment: Challenges and solutions for educational practice, International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, vol. 7(7), pp. 63-84, 2019.

M. Mowlaei. The impact of AFT on export performance of selected Asian developing countries, Asian Development Policy Review, vol. 5(4), pp. 253-261, 2017.

Kusaeri, L. U. Sadieda, T. Indayati, M. I. Faizien. Developing an Assessment instrument of higher order thinking skills in Mathematics with in islamic context, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1028(1), pp. 281-306, 2018. doi :10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012151

G. M. Saido, S. Siraj, A. B. Nordin, O. S. Al Amedy. Higher order thinking skills among secondary school students in Science learning, Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, vol. 3(3), pp. 13-20, 2015.

R. Fisher. Thinking skill. In J. Arthur, & T. Cremin (Eds.), Learning to teach in the primary school (2nd ed.), New York, NY: Routledge, 2010.

S. Krulik, J. A. Rudnick. Innovative tasks to improve critical and creative thinking skills. In L. V. Stiff & F. R. Curcio (Eds), Developing Mathematical reasoning in Grades K-12, pp. 138-145, Reston, Virginia: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1999.

Ministry of Education, Malaysia. Inisiatif kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi di sekolah, Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, 2013.

N. Azid, R. Md-Ali. The effect of the successful intelligence interactive module on Universiti Utara Malaysia students’ analytical, creative and practical thinking skills, South African Journal of Education, vol. 40(3), pp. 1-11, 2020.

N. Idris. Pedagogi dalam pendidikan Matematik, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Utusan, 2005.

National Research Council. Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of Mathematics education, Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1989.

T. S. Yen, S. H. Halili. Effective teaching of higher-order thinking (HOT) in education. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, vol. 3(2), pp. 41-47, 2015.

Z. Darus. Status pencapaian pelajar dalam TIMSS dan PISA: Satu refleksi, Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia, 2012.

S. Z. Syed Abdul Hakim, M. Mohini. Keupayaan dan sikap dalam menyelesaikan masalah Matematik bukan rutin (Ability and attitude in solving non-routine Mathematical problems), Jurnal Teknologi, vol. 53, pp. 47–62, 2010.

H. A., Nguyen, Y. Guo, J. Stamper, B. M. McLaren. Improving Students’ Problem-Solving Flexibility in Non-routine Mathematics. In I. Bittencourt, M. Cukurova, K. Muldner, R. Luckin, & E. Millán (Eds), Artificial Intelligence in Education, AIED 2020, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 12164, Springer, Cham, 2020. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-52240-7_74

Y. Yazgan. Non-routine Mathematical problem-solving at high school level and its relation success on university entrance exam, US-China Education Review, vol. 3(8), pp. 571-579, 2013.

F. Salleh, E. Zakaria. Non-routine problem-solving and attitudes toward problem-solving among high achievers, The International Journal of Learning, vol. 16(5), pp. 549-559, 2009.

J. Woodward, et al.. Improving Mathematical Problem Solving in Grades 4 through 8, IES Practice Guide, NCEE 2012-4055, What Works Clearinghouse, 2012.

J.C. Neubert, J. Mainert, A. Kretzschmar, S. Greiff. The assessment of 21st century skills in industrial and organizational psychology: Complex and collaborative problem solving, Industrial-Organizational Psychology, vol. 8, pp. 238–268, 2015.

C. Williamson. Teachers’ role in school-based assessment as part of public examinations, US-China Education Review B, vol. 7(6), pp. 301-307, 2017.

Hong Kong Diploma of Secondary Education. English Language examination, international practice in school-based assessment, 2012.

Ministry of Education and Culture. National Core Curriculum, Part IV: Chapters 7.10–7.21, Retrived from https://www.oph.fi/download/47673_core_curricula_basic_education_4.pdf, 2004.

K. A. Hendrickson. Assessment in Finland: A scholarly reflection on one country’s use of formative, summative, and evaluative practices, Mid-Western Educational Researcher, vol. 25(1/2), pp. 33-43, 2012.

C. Janisch, X. Liu, A. Akrofi. Implementing alternative assessment: Opportunities and obstacles, The Educational Forum, vol. 71, pp. 221-230, 2007.

R. Al-Mahrooqi, C. Denman. Alternative Assessment, In M. DelliCarpini, The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (1st ed), pp. 4851-4856, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2018. doi: 10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0325

G. Serin. Alternative assessment practices of a classroom teacher: Alignment with reform-based Science curriculum, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, vol. 11(2), pp. 277-297, 2015.

H. M. G. Watt. Attitudes to the use of alternative assessment methods in Mathematics: A study with secondary Mathematics teachers in Sydney, Australia, Educational Studies in Mathematics, vol. 58(1), pp. 21–44, 2005. doi:10.1007/s10649-005-3228-z

E. C. Alozie. Advertising in developing and emerging countries: The economic, political and social context, Farnham: Gower, 2011.

J. Sidharta. Here is why Indonesia is alike Malaysia, and vice versa, Retrieved from https://www.globalindonesianvoices.com/27223/here-is-why-indonesia-is-alike-malaysia-and-vice-versa/, 2016.

N. Nasri, S. N. Roslan, M. I. Sekuan, K. A. Bakar, S. N. Puteh. Teachers’ perception on alternative assessment, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 7(C), pp. 37-42, 2010.

I. B. Ghani, N. H. Ibrahim, N. A. Yahaya, J. Surif. Enhancing students HOTS in laboratory educational activity by using concept map as an alternative assessment tool, Chemistry Education Research and Practice, vol. 18(4), pp. 849-874, 2017.

V. Balakrishnan. Alternative assessment in Moral Education in Malaysia, I-manager’s Journal on School Educational Technology, vol. 1(4), pp. 67-72, 2006.

C. K. Singh, A. Samad. The use of portfolio as an assessment tool in the Malaysian L2 classroom, International Journal of English Language Education, vol. 1(1), 94-108, 2013.

I. Abrahams, R. Millar. Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, vol. 30(14), pp. 1945–1969, 2008.

Saefurrohman, E. S. Balinas. English teachers classroom assessment practices, International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), vol. 5(1), 82-92, 2016.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Informasi pentaksiran berasaskan sekolah (PBS), Lembaga Peperiksaan, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia: Kuala Lumpur, Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/dila1234/informasi-pentaksiran-berasaskan-sekolah-pbs, 2014.

N., Abdullah, N., Idris, M. S., Hamzah, S. Sembak. Planning and implementation of school-based assessment (SBA) among teachers, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 211, pp. 247-254, 2015.

Hong Kong Examination and Assessment Authority (HKEAA). School based assessment, Hong Kong: Hong Kong Examination and Assessment Authority, 2018.

A. N. Mansor, O. H. Leng, M. S. Rasul, R. A. Raof, & N. Yusoff. The benefits of school-based assessment, Asian Social Science, vol. 9(8), 2013.

Ministry of Education Malaysia. Ministry of Education Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025 (Preschool to Post-Secondary Education), Putrajaya, Malaysia: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, 2013.

L. W. Anderson, D. R. Krathwohl. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Complete Edition), New York: Longman, 2001.

B. G. Chew. Pengetahuan dan pengaplikasian kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi dalam kalangan guru teknik dan vokasional (Unpublished Master’s thesis), Retrieved from http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/9574/, 2017.

Z. Mahmod. Inovasi p&p dalam pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, Tanjung Malim: UPSI, 2012.

N. Rajendran. Teaching & acquiring higher-order thinking skills: Theory & practice, Malaysia: Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 2008.

H. B. Som. Profil kesediaan guru sekolah menengah terhadap pelaksanaan perubahan kurikulum (Unpublished Doctoral thesis), Faculty of Education, University Malaya, 2005.

S. Saad, S. N. Saad, M. U. Dollah. Pengajaran kemahiran berfikir: persepsi dan amalan guru Matematik semasa pengajaran dan pembelajaran di bilik darjah, Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, vol. 2(1), 18-36, 2012.

J. W. Creswell. Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.), United Kingdom: Pearson Education Limited, 2014.

V. Braun, V. Clark. Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners, Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE, 2013.

L. Elder, R. Paul, R. Cosgrove. Critical thinking testing and assessment, Retrieved from https://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/critical-thinking-testing-and-assessment/594, 2018.

J. R. Fraenkel, N. E. Wallen, H. H. Hyun. How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.), New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2012.

A. Field. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics, London, United Kingdom: Sage Publication, 2015.

A. F. Majid. School-based assessment in Malaysia schools: the concerns of the English teachers, Journal of US-China Education Review, vol. 8(10), pp. 1-15, 2011.

J. Biggs. Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does, Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education, 2003.

S. Barry, K. Murphy, S. Drew. From deconstructive misalignment to constructive alignment: Exploring student uses of mobile technologies in university classrooms, Computers & Education, vol. 81, pp. 202-210, 2015.

S. G. Mkpae, V. Obowu-Adutchay. School-based assessment: Benefit and teachers’ perception in Nigerian secondary schools, International Journal of Education and Evaluation, vol. 3(2), pp. 19-27, 2017.

D. C. Geary. Mathematics and learning disabilities, Journal of Learning Disabilities, vol. 37, pp. 4–15, 2004. doi: 10.1177/00222194040370010201

R. Sidabutar. The efforts to improve mathematics learning achievement results of high school students as required by competency based curriculum and lesson level-based curriculum, Journal of Education and Practice, vol. 7(15), pp. 10-15, 2016.

R. M. Martinez, D. R. McGrath, E. Foster. How deeper learning can create a new vision for teaching. National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future 1525 Wilson Boulevard Suite 705 Arlington, Retrieved from https://nctaf.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/NCTAF-ConsultEd_How-Deeper-Learning-Can-Create-a-New-Vision-for-Teaching.pdf, 2016.

N. Azid, R. Hassan, N. F. M, Nazaruddin, R. Md-Ali. Embracing industrial revolution 4.0: The effect of using web 2.0 tools on primary school students’ mathematics achievement (Fraction), International Journal of Instruction, vol. 13(3), 711-728, 2020.

G., Sonnert, P. M., Sadler, S. M., Sadler, D. M. Bressourd. The impact of instructor pedagogy on college calculus students’ attitude toward Mathematics, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, vol. 46(3), pp. 370-387, 2015.

DOI: http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i1.22030


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science

International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE)
p-ISSN: 2252-8822, e-ISSN: 2620-5440

View IJERE Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.