Instrument evaluation of conspiracy theory about COVID-19: Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis

Ahmad Fauzi, Muhammad Saefi, Widi Cahya Adi, Evi Kristiana, Nurlita Lestariani

Abstract


Students’ beliefs toward conspiracy theory (CT) of COVID-19 can be the indication of science education quality. However, a validated instrument to measure the level of students’ acceptance on the CT about COVID-19 still remains unexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the questionnaire of CT about COVID-19. The questionnaire consisted of 14 items, and was delivered online to the 400 students of Biology education in Indonesia. The data was analyzed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (EFA). All items have standard deviation between 1.60 and 2.63, but one item was revealed to have insignificant correlation. The EFA result indicated that the other 13 items had loading factor above 0.5 and were categorized into three dimensions. The third dimension was eliminated after the administration of CFA due to only one item in the dimension (λ > 0.5). Three items in the first dimension and two items in the second dimension resulted in λ < 0.5. The correlated model from CFA disclosed good values of GOF, i.e. χ2/df= 2.527, RMSEA SRMR= 0.014, CFI=0.964, GFI= 0.969, AGFI= 0.940, TLI= 0.947, and NFI= 0.943. Therefore, this questionnaire is strongly recommended to measure the level of students’ beliefs toward the CT of COVID-19.

Keywords


Conspiracy theory; COVID-19 pandemic; misinformation; science education; science literacy

References


J. Osborne, “The 21st century challenge for science education: Assessing scientific reasoning,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 10, pp. 265–279, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2013.07.006.

Z. R. Dagher and S. Erduran, “Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education,” Sci. Educ., vol. 25, no. 1–2, pp. 147–164, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s11191-015-9800-8.

D. Tang, P. Comish, and R. Kang, “The hallmarks of COVID-19 disease,” PLoS Pathog., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1–24, 2020, doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008536.

D. Cucinotta and M. Vanelli, “WHO declares COVID-19 a pandemic,” Acta Biomed., vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 157–160, 2020, doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i1.9397.

E. Mahase, “Coronavirus covid-19 has killed more people than SARS and MERS combined, despite lower case fatality rate,” BMJ, vol. 368, no. February, p. m641, 2020, doi: 10.1136/bmj.m641.

K. Yuki, M. Fujiogi, and S. Koutsogiannaki, “COVID-19 pathophysiology: A review,” Clin. Immunol., vol. 215, no. April, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2020.108427.

Z. Gao et al., “A systematic review of asymptomatic infections with COVID-19,” J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect., no. xxxx, pp. 1–5, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2020.05.001.

S. J. Daniel, “Education and the COVID-19 pandemic,” Prospects, vol. 49, no. 1–2, pp. 91–96, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11125-020-09464-3.

C. Sánchez-Cruzado, R. Santiago Campión, and M. T. Sánchez-Compaña, “Teacher digital literacy: The indisputable challenge after COVID-19,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 1858, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13041858.

C. Owusu-Fordjour, C. K. Koomson, and D. Hanson, “The impact of COVID-19 on learning - The perspectve of the Ghanaian student,” Eur. J. Educ. Stud., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 88–101, 2020, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3753586.

S. Bubb and M.-A. Jones, “Learning from the COVID-19 home-schooling experience: Listening to pupils, parents/carers and teachers,” Improv. Sch., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 209–222, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1177/1365480220958797.

N. Lurie, M. Saville, R. Hatchett, and J. Halton, “Developing Covid-19 vaccines at pandemic speed,” N. Engl. J. Med., vol. 382, no. 21, pp. 1969–1973, May 2020, doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2005630.

T. Thanh Le et al., “The COVID-19 vaccine development landscape,” Nat. Rev. Drug Discov., vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 305–306, 2020, doi: 10.1038/d41573-020-00073-5.

B. S. Graham, “Rapid COVID-19 vaccine development,” Science (80-. )., vol. 368, no. 6494, pp. 945–946, May 2020, doi: 10.1126/science.abb8923.

A. Bruns, S. Harrington, and E. Hurcombe, “‘Corona? 5G? or both?’: The dynamics of COVID-19/5G conspiracy theories on Facebook,” Media Int. Aust., vol. 177, no. 1, pp. 12–29, 2020, doi: 10.1177/1329878X20946113.

B. Y. Lee, “Bill gates is now a target of COVID-19 coronavirus conspiracy theories,” Forbes, Apr. 2020.

J.-B. Nie, “In the shadow of biological warfare: conspiracy theories on the origins of COVID-19 and enhancing global governance of biosafety as a matter of urgency,” J. Bioeth. Inq., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 567–574, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11673-020-10025-8.

R. Imhoff and P. Lamberty, “A Bioweapon or a hoax? The link between distinct conspiracy beliefs about the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak and pandemic behavior,” Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci., vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 1110–1118, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1177/1948550620934692.

A. Gruzd and P. Mai, “Going viral: How a single tweet spawned a COVID-19 conspiracy theory on Twitter,” Big Data Soc., vol. 7, no. 2, 2020, doi: 10.1177/2053951720938405.

H. O. Y. Li, A. Bailey, D. Huynh, and J. Chan, “YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19: A pandemic of misinformation?,” BMJ Glob. Heal., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 1–6, 2020, doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002604.

R. Brotherton and C. C. French, “Belief in conspiracy theories and susceptibility to the conjunction fallacy,” Appl. Cogn. Psychol., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 238–248, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.1002/acp.2995.

K. L. Einstein and D. M. Glick, “Do I think BLS data are BS? The consequences of conspiracy theories,” Polit. Behav., vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 679–701, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s11109-014-9287-z.

S. Lewandowsky, G. E. Gignac, and K. Oberauer, “The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 10, 2013, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075637.

S. Van der Linden, “The conspiracy-effect: Exposure to conspiracy theories (about global warming) decreases pro-social behavior and science acceptance,” Pers. Individ. Dif., vol. 87, pp. 171–173, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.045.

B. L. Miller, “Science denial and COVID conspiracy theories,” JAMA, vol. 324, no. 22, pp. 2255–2256, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.21332.

T. Goertzel, “Conspiracy theories in science,” EMBO Rep., vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 493–499, 2010, doi: 10.1038/embor.2010.84.

T. Oleksy, A. Wnuk, D. Maison, and A. Łyś, “Content matters. Different predictors and social consequences of general and government-related conspiracy theories on COVID-19,” Pers. Individ. Dif., vol. 168, no. May 2020, p. 110289, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110289.

D. Allington, B. Duffy, S. Wessely, N. Dhavan, and J. Rubin, “Health-protective behaviour, social media usage, and conspiracy belief during the COVID-19 public health emergency,” Psychol. Med., 2020, doi: 10.1017/S003329172000224X.

M. Sallam et al., “Conspiracy beliefs are associated with lower knowledge and higher anxiety levels regarding covid-19 among students at the university of Jordan,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 17, no. 14, pp. 1–15, 2020, doi: 10.3390/ijerph17144915.

N. Galliford and A. Furnham, “Individual difference factors and beliefs in medical and political conspiracy theories,” Scand. J. Psychol., vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 422–428, 2017, doi: 10.1111/sjop.12382.

J. W. van Prooijen, “Why education predicts decreased belief in conspiracy theories,” Appl. Cogn. Psychol., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 50–58, 2017, doi: 10.1002/acp.3301.

A. Fauzi, H. Husamah, F. J. Miharja, D. Fatmawati, T. I. Permana, and A. M. Hudha, “Exploring COVID-19 literacy level among biology teacher candidates,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 16, no. 7, p. em1864, May 2020, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/8270.

M. Saefi et al., “Survey data of COVID-19-related knowledge, attitude, and practices among indonesian undergraduate students,” Data Br., vol. 31, p. 105855, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105855.

A. Goreis and O. D. Kothgassner, “Social media as vehicle for conspiracy beliefs on COVID-19,” Digit. Psychol., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 36–39, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.24989/dp.v1i2.1866.

R. Brotherton, C. C. French, and A. D. Pickering, “Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: The generic conspiracist beliefs scale,” Front. Psychol., vol. 4, no. MAY, pp. 1–15, 2013, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00279.

A. Lantian, D. Muller, C. Nurra, and K. M. Douglas, “Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: Validation of a French and English single-item scale,” Int. Rev. Soc. Psychol., vol. 29, no. 1, p. 1, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.5334/irsp.8.

M. Saefi et al., “Validating of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices questionnaire for prevention of COVID-19 infections among undergraduate students: A RASCH and factor analysis,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 16, no. 12, p. em1926, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/9352.

M. Tavakol and A. Wetzel, “Factor analysis: A means for theory and instrument development in support of construct validity,” Int. J. Med. Educ., vol. 11, pp. 245–247, 2020, doi: 10.5116/ijme.5f96.0f4a.

M. Alavi, D. C. Visentin, D. K. Thapa, G. E. Hunt, R. Watson, and M. Cleary, “Chi-square for model fit in confirmatory factor analysis,” J. Adv. Nurs., vol. 76, no. 9, pp. 2209–2211, 2020, doi: 10.1111/jan.14399.

R. A. Friedman, “Why humans are vulnerable to conspiracy theories,” Psychiatr. Serv., vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 3–4, 2021, doi: 10.1176/APPI.PS.202000348.

S. Shahsavari, P. Holur, T. Wang, T. R. Tangherlini, and V. Roychowdhury, “Conspiracy in the time of corona: automatic detection of emerging COVID-19 conspiracy theories in social media and the news,” J. Comput. Soc. Sci., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 279–317, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s42001-020-00086-5.

J. E. Uscinski et al., “Why do people believe COVID-19 conspiracy theories?,” Harvard Kennedy Sch. Misinformation Rev., vol. 1, no. April, pp. 1–12, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.37016/mr-2020-015.

D. Freeman et al., “Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England,” Psychol. Med., pp. 1–13, May 2020, doi: 10.1017/S0033291720001890.

P. Bertin, K. Nera, and S. Delouvée, “Conspiracy beliefs, rejection of vaccination, and support for hydroxychloroquine: A Conceptual replication-extension inc the COVID-19 pandemic context,” Front. Psychol., vol. 11, no. September, pp. 1–9, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.565128.

T. Burki, “The online anti-vaccine movement in the age of COVID-19,” Lancet Digit. Heal., vol. 2, no. 10, pp. e504–e505, 2020, doi: 10.1016/s2589-7500(20)30227-2.

W. Cornwall, “Officials gird for a war on vaccine misinformation,” Science, vol. 369, no. 6499, pp. 14–15, 2020.

D. Romer and K. H. Jamieson, “Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of COVID-19 in the U.S.,” Soc. Sci. Med., vol. 263, p. 113356, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113356.

K. Bierwiaczonek, J. R. Kunst, and O. Pich, “Belief in COVID-19 conspiracy theories reduces social distancing over time,” Appl. Psychol. Heal. Well-Being, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1270–1285, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1111/aphw.12223.

J. E. Oliver and T. Wood, “Medical conspiracy theories and health behaviors in the United States,” JAMA Intern. Med., vol. 174, no. 5, pp. 817–818, 2014, doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.190.

R. Blaskiewicz, “The Big Pharma conspiracy theory,” Med. Writ., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 259–261, 2013, doi: 10.1179/2047480613z.000000000142.

E. K. Vraga, M. Tully, and L. Bode, “Empowering users to respond to misinformation about COVID-19,” Media Commun., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 475–479, 2020, doi: 10.17645/mac.v8i2.3200.

T. Koltay, “The media and the literacies: Media literacy, information literacy, digital literacy,” Media, Cult. Soc., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 211–221, 2011, doi: 10.1177/0163443710393382.

D. Bawden, “Origins and concepts of digital literacy,” Digit. literacies Concepts, policies Pract., pp. 17–32, 2008, doi: 10.1093/elt/ccr077.




DOI: http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i2.22339

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science

International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE)
p-ISSN: 2252-8822, e-ISSN: 2620-5440

View IJERE Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.