Cooperative Learning Using Problem Based Learning for Engineering Students: Pliancy and Resistance

Abdul Hannan Qureshi

Abstract


The problem-based learning (PBL) methodologies are considered adequate for core engineering courses. The integration between cooperative learning and PBL methodologies establishes an encouraging environment for the students. However, for effective implementation of PBL and CPBL environment, close supervision of students’ experiences is vital, and deficient areas are to be improved, as PBL is a dynamic process. A study was conducted for the first-year undergraduate engineering class, taught under the PBL environment. The objective of the study was the evaluation of course by the preview of students for highlighting weak domains for future improvements in the PBL methodology. A PBL-Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) was developed with 35 items, and responses were collected by the end of the semester. Three different analyses were performed on the collected data. i.e., descriptive statistics and Cronbach’s alpha, Student's t-test, and Pearson chi-square test. The results achieved by the aforementioned tests overall supported the effective adoption of PBL system by the students. However, few areas were highlighted requiring special consideration, such as PBL workload, pressure due to extra course content and assessment opportunities under the PBL system. It was concluded that maximum students considered PBL methodologies convenient and effective for learning than the traditional learning approach.

Keywords


Engineering education; Quantitative analysis; Transition; Cooperative learning; Small group collaboration

References


C. I. Davidson et al., “Preparing future engineers for challenges of the 21st century: Sustainable engineering,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 698–701, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.12.021.

F. Lamb, C. Arlett, R. Dales, B. Ditchfield, and W. Wakeham, “Engineering Graduates for Industry,” R. Acad. Eng., no. February, p. 72, 2010.

Times Higher Education, “The Global University Employability Ranking 2017,” Time High. Educ., vol. 16, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/features/which-countries-and-universities-produce-most-employable-graduates.

S. Mabley, E. Ventura-Medina, and A. Anderson, “‘I’m lost’ – a qualitative analysis of student teams’ strategies during their first experience in problem-based learning,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–20, 2019, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2019.1646709.

W. Hung and S. M. Loyens, “Global development of problem-based learning: Adoption, adaptation, and advancement,” Interdiscip. J. Probl. Learn., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 4–9, 2012, [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1309.

K. A. Abou-Elhamd, U. M. Rashad, and A. I. Al-Sultan, “Applying problem-based learning to otolaryngology teaching,” J. Laryngol. Otol., vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 117–120, 2011, doi: 10.1017/S0022215110001702.

N. Sockalingam, J. Rotgans, and H. G. Schmidt, “Student and tutor perceptions on attributes of effective problems in problem-based learning,” High. Educ., vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2011, doi: 10.1007/s10734-010-9361-3.

L. A. Yuen Lie Lim, “A comparison of students’ reflective thinking across different years in a problem-based learning environment,” Instr. Sci., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 171–188, 2011, doi: 10.1007/s11251-009-9123-8.

N. Davidson and C. H. Major, “Boundary crossings: Cooperative learning, collaborative learning, and problem-based learning.,” J. Excell. Coll. Teach., vol. 25, 2014.

M. McParland, L. M. Noble, and G. Livingston, “The effectiveness of problem-based learning compared to traditional teaching in undergraduate psychiatry,” Med. Educ., vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 859–867, 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01818.x.

F. M. van Blankenstein, D. H. J. M. Dolmans, C. P. M. van der Vleuten, and H. G. Schmidt, “Which cognitive processes support learning during small-group discussion? The role of providing explanations and listening to others,” Instr. Sci., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 189–204, 2011, doi: 10.1007/s11251-009-9124-7.

D. İnel and A. G. Balım, “Concept Cartoons Assisted Problem based Learning Method in Science and Technology Teaching and Students’ Views,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 93, pp. 376–380, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.206.

K. M. Yusof, S. A. H. S. Hassan, M. Z. Jamaludin, and N. F. Harun, “Cooperative Problem-based Learning (CPBL): Framework for Integrating Cooperative Learning and Problem-based Learning,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 56, pp. 223–232, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.649.

Oon-Sen Tan, Problem-Based Leearning Innovation: Using Problem to Power Learning in the 21st Century. 2003.

A. J. Nathan and A. Scobell, “How China sees America,” in Foreign Affairs, 2012, vol. 91, no. 5, doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.

M. A. Bujang, E. D. Omar, and N. A. Baharum, “A Review on Sample Size Determination for Cronbach’s Alpha Test: A Simple Guide for Researchers,” Malaysian J. Med. Sci., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 85–99, 2018, doi: 10.21315/mjms2018.25.6.9.

R. Conroy, “Sample size A rough guide,” Retreived from http//www. beaumontethics. ie/docs/application/samplesizecalculation. pdf, 2015.

A. Delice, “The Sampling Issues in Quantitative Research,” Educ. Sci. Theory Pract., 2010, [Online]. Available: http://methods.sagepub.com/book/doing-conversation-discourse-and-document-analysis.

P. Ramsden, “A Performance Indicator of Teaching Quality in Higher Education: The Course Experience Questionnaire,” Stud. High. Educ., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 129–150, 1991, doi: 10.1080/03075079112331382944.

K. L. Wilson, A. Lizzio, and P. Ramsden, “The Development, Validation and Application of the Course Experience Questionnaire,” Stud. High. Educ., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 33–53, 1997, doi: 10.1080/03075079712331381121.

D. D. Curtis and J. P. Keeves, “The course experience questionnaire as an institutional performance indicator,” Int. Educ. J., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 73–82, 2000.

B. Shamsan and A. T. Syed, “Evaluation of problem based learning course at college of medicine, qassim university, saudi arabia.,” Int. J. Health Sci. (Qassim)., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 249–58, 2009, [Online]. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21475544%0Ahttp://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC3068813.

A. K. Chakrabarty, J. T. E. Richardson, and M. K. Sen, “Validating the Course Experience Questionnaire in West Bengal higher secondary education,” Stud. Educ. Eval., vol. 50, pp. 71–78, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.06.007.

S. Asonitou, A. Mandilas, E. Chytis, and D. Latsou, “A Greek Evaluation Of The Course Experience Questionnaire: Students’ Conceptions Of The Teaching Quality Of Higher Education Accounting Studies,” Int. J. Bus. Econ. Sci. Appl. Res., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 51–62, 2018, doi: 10.25103/ijbesar.112.06.

N. Demir, S. Serel Arslan, Ö. İnal, and A. A. Karaduman, “Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Eating Assessment Tool (T-EAT-10),” Dysphagia, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 644–649, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s00455-016-9723-9.

K. S. Taber, “The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education,” Res. Sci. Educ., vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1273–1296, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2.

K. Mohd-Yusof, S. R. Wan Alwi, A. N. Sadikin, and A. Abdul-Aziz, “Inculcating sustainability among first-year engineering students using cooperative problem-based learning,” in Sustainability in Higher Education, Elsevier, 2015, pp. 67–95.

T. K. Kim, “T test as a parametric statistic,” Korean J. Anesthesiol., vol. 68, no. 6, p. 540, 2015, doi: 10.4097/kjae.2015.68.6.540.




DOI: http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i2.22243

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science

International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE)
p-ISSN: 2252-8822, e-ISSN: 2620-5440

View IJERE Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.