Promoting students metacognitive awareness and cognitive learning outcomes in science education

Silfia Ilma, Mimien Henie Irawati Al Muhdhar, Fatchur Rohman, Murni Saptasari

Abstract


This research aims to investigate the effect of Project-based Learning (PjBL), predict-Observe-Explain (POE), and Predict-Observe-Explain based Project (POEP) on metacognitive awareness and cognitive learning outcomes in Biology learning. The research used a pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group design. The experiment was conducted from August to December 2020. The metacognitive awareness questionnaire was applied to measure students metacognitive awareness. Besides, an essay test was used to assess cognitive learning outcomes. The ANCOVA results analysis showed that PjBL, POE, and POEP affected students metacognitive awareness and cognitive learning outcomes in Biology learning with a value of p<0.005. The LSD result were significantly different in improving students metacognitive awareness and cognitive learning outcomes. The POEP class gained the highest posttest score. Therefore, POEP could be applicable to improve students metacognitive awareness and cognitive learning outcomes in Biology learning.


Keywords


Metacognitive awareness; cognitive learning outcome; predict observe explain; project-based learning; predict observe explain based project

References


REFERENCES

S. Jaleel, and P. Premachandran, “The Metacognitive Awareness of Secondary School Students,” Universal Journal of Educational Research, vol. 4, pp. 165-172, 2016.

N. Lara Nieto-Márquez, et al., “Digital Teaching Materials and Their Relationship with the Metacognitive Skills of Students in Primary Education,” Education Science, vol. 10, pp. 1-18. 2020.

A. V. Cyril, and M. A. Raj, “Emotional Maturity and Metacognition of High School Teachers,” i-manager’s Journal on Education Psychology, vol. 12, pp. 36-43, 2018.

C. H. Padmanabha, “Metacognition: Conceptual Framework,” Journal on Educational Psychology, vol. 14, pp. 1-11, 2020.

E. Fox, and M, Riconscente, “Metacognition and Self-regulation in James, Piaget, and Vygotsky,” Education Psychology Review, vol. 20, pp. 373–389, 2008.

G. Schraw, and R. S. Dennison, “Assessing metacognitive awareness,” Contemporary Education Psychology, vol. 19, pp. 460-475, 1994.

C. Thenmozhi, “Models of Metacognition,” International Journal of Education, vol. 7, pp. 1-4, 2019.

T. García, et al., “Elementary Students’ Metacognitive Processes and Post-performance Calibration on Mathematical Problem-solving Tasks,” Metacognition Learning, vol. 11, pp. 139–170, 2015.

D. Purnomo, et al., “The Characteristic of the Process of Students Metacognition in Solving Calculuc Problems,” International Education Study,” vol. 10, pp. 13-25, 2017.

F. Radmehr, and M. Drake, “Exploring Students’ Metacognitive Knowledge the Case of Integral Calculus,” Education Science, vol. 10, pp. 1-20, 2020.

Idawati, et al., “Investigating the Effects of Problem-Solving Method and Cognitive Flexibility in Improving University Students’ Metacognitive,” Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientist, vol. 8, pp. 651-665, 2020.

S. C. Choy, et al., “Mediating effects of Quality Learning on Metacognitive Knowledge, Metacognitive Experience, and Outcomes,” Educational Research, vol. 29, pp. 1-18, 2019.

B. Kramarski, et al., “The Effects of Metacognitive Instruction on Solving Mathematical Authentic Tasks,” Education Studies in Mathematics, vol. 49, pp. 225–250, 2002.

M. G. Rhodes, “Metacognition,” Teaching of Psychology, vol. 1, pp. 37-46, 2019.

S. L. Zorluoglu, and Ç. Güven, “Analysis of 5th Grade Science Learning Outcomes and Exam Questions According to Revised Bloom Taxonomy,” Journal of Educational, vol. 6, pp. 58-69, 2020.

V. Prachagool, and P. Nuangchalerm, “ Investigating Understanding the Nature of Science,” International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, vol. 8, pp. 719-725, 2019.

D. Adom, et al., “Test, Measurement, and Evaluation: Understanding and Use of the Concepts in Education,” International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, vol. 9, pp. 109-119, 2020.

N. Hasnunidah, et al., “The Contribution of Argumentation and Critical Thinking Skills on Students’ Concept Understanding in Different Learning Models,” Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, vol. 17, pp. 1-13, 2020.

S. Ilma. et al., “The Correlation Between Science Process Skills and Biology Cognitive Learning Outcome of Senior High School Student,” Indonesian Journal of Biology Education, vol. 6, pp. 55-64, 2020.

N. Foldnes, “The Flipped Classroom and Cooperative Learning: Evidence From a Randomised Experiment,” Active Learning in Higher Education, vol. 17, pp. 39–49, 2016.

H. A. McQueen, and C. McMillan, “Quectures: Personalised Constructive Learning in Lectures,” Active Learning in Higher Education, vol. 21, pp. 217-231, 2020.

T. Nalkiran, and S. Karamustafaouglu, “Prediction-Observation-Explanation (POE) Method and Its Efficiency in Teaching Work, Energy, Power Concepts,” International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, vol. 7, pp. 497–521, 2020.

P. A. Bajar-Sales, et al., “Predict-Explain-Observe-Explain (PEOE) Approach: Tool in Relating Metacognition to Achievement in Chemistry,” Electronic Journal of Science Education, vol. 19, pp. 1-21, 2015.

D. Susanti, et al., “The Influence of Learning Model Discovery Learning Type POE and Learning Activities on Metacognitive Ability,” Inomatika, vol. 2, pp. 93-105, 2020.

D. Furqani, et al., “The Effect of Predict-Observe-Explain (POE) Strategy on Students’ Conceptual Mastery and Critical Thinking in Learning Vibration and Wave,” Journal of Science Learning, vol. 2, pp. 1-8, 2018.

E. Viro, et al., “Teacher’ Perspectives On Project-Based Learning in Mathematics and Science,” European Journal of Science and Mathematics, vol. 8, pp. 12-31, 2020.

Habibi, et al., “Project Brief Effect on Creative Thinking Skills Among Low-Ability Pre-Service Physics Teachers,” International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, vol. 9, pp. 415-420, 2020.

P. N. Eckardt, et al., “The Impact of Project-Based Learning on Student Content Knowledge in an Undergraduate, Teacher Preparation, Foundations of Education Course,” Journal for Leadership and Instruction, vol.19, pp. 38-42, 2020.

S. Bakkaloglu, “Analysis of Metacognitive Awareness of Primary and Secondary School Students in Terms of Some Variables,” Journal of Education and Learning, vol. 9, pp. 156-163, 2020.

M. Olesen, “Cooperative Collaboration in the Hybrid Space of Google Docs Based Group Work,” Education. Science, vol. 10, pp. 1-13, 2020.

K. R. Heggart, and J. Yoo, “Getting the Most from Google Classroom: A Pedagogical Framework for Tertiary Educators,” Australian Journal of Teaching Education, vol. 43, pp. 140-153, 2018.

E. E. Howe, “Does Metacognitive Reflection Benefit Art Students?,” International Dialogues on Education: Past and Present, vol. 6, pp. 139-163, 2019.

T. M. Miller, and L. Geraci, “Training Metacognition in the Classroom: The Influence of Incentives and Feedback on Exam Predictions,” Metacognition Learning, vol. 6, pp. 303–314, 2011.

J. W. Mahoney, and B. Harris-Reeves, “The Effects of Collaborative Testing on Higher Order Thinking: Do the Bright get Brighter?,” Active Learning in Higher Education, vol. 20, pp. 25-37, 2019.

A. Oguz-Unver, et al., “Teaching Strategy for Developing the Power of Observation in Science Education,” Online Submission, vol. 28, pp. 105-119, 2009.

L. Topinka, and D. T. Sands, “Sketching as a Science Tool,” Connect, vol. 19, pp. 4-7, 2005.

H. C. Hill, and P. Grossman, “Learning from Teacher Observations: Challenges and Opportunities Posed by New Teacher Evaluation Systems,” Harvard Education Review, vol. 83, pp. 371–384, 2013.

J. N. Mikeska, et al., “Using Classroom Observations to Evaluate Science Teaching: Implications of Lesson Sampling for Measuring Science Teaching Effectiveness Acros Lesson Types,” Science Education Policy, vol. 103, pp. 123-144, 2018.

K. B. Remmen, and M. Frøyland, “Students’ Use of Observation in Geology: Towards ‘Scientific Observation’ in Rock Classification,” International Journal of Science Education, vol. 42, pp. 113-132, 2020.

N. Simper, et al., “Effects of Concept Mapping on Creativity in Photo Stories,” Creativity Research Journal, vol. 28, pp. 46-51, 2016.




DOI: http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i1.22083

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science

International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE)
p-ISSN: 2252-8822, e-ISSN: 2620-5440

View IJERE Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.