Calibration of the Science Process Skills among Malaysian Elementary Students: A Rasch Model Analysis

Nazahiyah binti Mustafa, Dr Ahmad Zamri bin Khairani, Dr Nor Asniza binti Ishak

Abstract


This study aimed to calibrate the test items of science process skills used as a test at primary school students to provide information on the difficulty of each item. Data were collected from 128 standard five students in a primary school in Penang. The test was given in multiple-choice as many as 40 items consisting of 33 items partial credit test was developed to gather information from the students. The analysis included an assessment of the model’s assumptions and calibrations according to the individual items. We also provided information on the Rasch calibration according to the topic. Results revealed that the measurement made fulfilled both model-data fit and unidimensionality assumptions. Further analysis showed that observing and communicating were endorsed as the easiest to master while inferring and classifying were the most challenging. We also discussed the implication of the study, particularly towards the teaching and learning of science process skills in the classroom. This finding suggests that teachers should seriously consider the science process skills when designing their teaching and learning strategies in the classroom.


Keywords


Rasch model analysis, Science process skills, Elementary students

References


A. Yılmaz, “The effect of technology integration in education on prospective teachers’ critical and creative thinking, multidimensional 21st century skills and academic achievements,” Particip. Educ. Res., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 163–199, 2021.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM), “Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran,” Kementeri. Pendidik. Malaysia, 2014.

Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Tahun Lima. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, 2014.

L. N. Nworgu and V. V. Otum, “Effect of Guided Inquiry with Analogy Instructional Strategy on Students Acquisition of Science Process Skills,” vol. 4, no. 27, pp. 35–41, 2013.

S. Susdarwati, A. Dimas, and F. Hannum, “The development of scientific literacy-based physics learning module on direct current circuit material,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1869, no. 1, p. 012164, 2021.

W. Wartono, M. N. Hudha, and J. R. Batlolona, “How are the physics critical thinking skills of the students taught by using inquiry-discovery through empirical and theorethical overview?,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 691–697, 2018.

M. Leasa, J. R. Batlolona, and M. Talakua, “Elementary students’ creative thinking skills in science in the Maluku islands, Indonesia,” Creat. Stud., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 74–89, 2021.

J. R. Batlolona, C. Baskar, M. A. Kurnaz, and M. Leasa, “The improvement of problem-solving skills and physics concept mastery on temperature and heat topic,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 273–279, 2018.

Salasiah Zainuddin, “Pembinaan dan penentusahan instrumen ujian kemahiran proses sains bersepadu sekolah rendah,” 2016.

Ong Eng Tek, “Tahap Penguasaan Kemahiran Proses Sains Bersepadu ( Kpsb ) Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan 2 Di Daerah Temerloh,” J. Pengaj. Pendidik., pp. 1–20, 2006.

E. H. M. Shahali and L. Halim, “Development and validation of a test of integrated science process skills,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 9, pp. 142–146, 2010.

K. N. Azizah, M. Ibrahim, and W. Widodo, “Process Skill Assessment Instrument: Innovation to measure student’s learning result holistically,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 947, no. 1, 2018.

KPM, “Perangkaan Pendidikan Malaysia,” Kementeri. Pendidik. Malaysia, 2015.

R. A. A. Rauf, M. S. Rasul, A. N. Mansor, Z. Othman, and N. Lyndon, “Inculcation of science process skills in a science classroom,” Asian Soc. Sci., vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 47–57, 2013.

Darmaji, D. A. Kurniawan, Astalini, R. Perdana, Kuswanto, and M. Ikhlas, “Do a science process skills affect on critical thinking in science? Differences in urban and rural,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 874–880, 2020.

M. Mohd Al-junaidi and E. T. Ong, “Test of basic and integrated science process skills (T-BISPS): how do form four ftudents in Kelantan fare?,” Int. J. Assess. Eval. Educ., vol. 3, pp. 15–30, 2013.

E. T. Ong, P. Ramiah, K. Ruthven, S. M. Salleh, N. A. N. Yusuff, and S. E. Mokhsein, “Acquisition of basic science process skills among Malaysian upper primary students,” Res. Educ., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 88–101, 2015.

Ellyza Karim & Kamisah Osman, E. E. Karim, and K. O. Osman, “Kesahan dan Kebolehpercayaan Ujian Kemahiran Proses Sains untuk Murid Sekolah Rendah Berdasarkan Model Pengukuran Rasch,” J. Pendidik. Malaysia, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 1–9, 2019.

S. Sulaiman and A. Rugayah, “Tahap Penguasaan Kemahiran Membuat Inferens, Membuat Hipotesis Dan Mentafsir Data Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Tahun Empat Ijazah Sarjana Muda Sains Serta Pendidikan (Sains),” Univ. Teknol. Malaysia, p. 10, 2006.

Ong Eng Tek and Mohd Al-junaidi, “Pembinaan dan Penentusahan Instrumen Kemahiran Proses Sains Untuk Sekolah Menengah,” sainshumanika.utm.my, pp. 7–20, 2014.

K. I. Gamor, “Insights on identifying potential types of guidance for supporting student inquiry when using virtual and remote labs in science,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 239–242, 2021.

Shaharom Noordin and N. F. M. Saat, “Tahap Kefahaman Kemahiran Memerhati Dan Mentakrif Secara Operasi Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Tahun Dua Pendidikan Fizik,” Fak. Pendidik. Univ. Teknol. Malaysia, p. 9, 2007.

S. Prajoko, M. Amin, F. Rohman, and M. Gipayana, “The Profile and The Understanding of Science Process Skills Surakarta Open University Students in Science Lab Courses,” Int. Conf. Teach. Train. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 980–985, 2016.

J. S. Rabacal, “Test of Science Process Skills of Biology Students towards Developing of Learning Exercises,” Asia Pacific J. Multidiscip. Res., vol. 4, no. 44, pp. 9–16, 2016.

N. A. Nadhirah, D. A. Muiz Lidzinillah, N. H. Yanti, and A. B. Ahmad, “Instrument analysis of elementary students’ curiosity on natural science subjects using the Rasch model,” Univers. J. Educ. Res., vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 4897–4908, 2020.

S. Rahmawati, A. Widodo, and E. Eliyawati, “STEM learning on environmental pollution topic: Identifying science self-efficacy instrument using Rasch model analysis,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1806, no. 1, pp. 0–7, 2021.

Wright and Masters, “Rating Scales Analysis Rasch Measurement,” 1982.

Bond and Fox, Applying the Rasch Model, Third Edit. Routledge, 2015.

W. J. Boone, “Rasch analysis for instrument development: Why,when,and how?,” CBE Life Sci. Educ., vol. 15, no. 4, 2016.

P. Susongko, “Validation of science achievement test with the Rasch model,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 268–277, 2016.

J. Linacre, “A user’s guide to Winsteps/Ministeps Rasch-Model programs,” 2005.

2008 Wim &Hambleton, 1996 dan Ayala and C. H. Yu, “A simple guide to Item Response Theory (IRT) and Rasch Modeling,” p. 30, 2012.

T. G. Bond and C. M.Fox, Applying the Rasch Model, vol. 53, no. 9. 2019.

Wright and & Masters, “Rating scale,” 2002. [Online]. Available: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Wright%2C+B.+D.+%26+Masters%2C+G.+N.+%281982%29.+Rating+scale+analysis%3A+Rasch+measurement.++MESA+Press%2C+Chicago.&btnG. [Accessed: 04-Apr-2020].

J. M. Linacre, “A user’s guide to WINSTEPS,” 2005. [Online]. Available: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Linacre%2C+J.+M.+%5B2005%5D.++A+user’s+guide+to+WINSTEPS%3A+Rasch+Model+computer+programs.+MESA+Press%2C+Chicago&btnG=. [Accessed: 03-Apr-2020].

Linacre, “Winsteps Program Manual: Winsteps Help.” 2014.

M. Ibrahim, N. S. Lede, Suryanti, M. Ibrahim, and N. S. Lede, “Process skills approach to develop primary students’ scientific literacy: A case study with low achieving students on water cycle,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 296, no. 1, Feb. 2018.

A. J. Nitko and S. M. Brookhart, “Educational Assessment of Students,” eText with Loose-Leaf Version -- Access Card Packag., pp. 1–39, 2015.

O. Spektor-Levy, B. S. Eylon, and Z. Scherz, “Teaching scientific communication skills in science studies: Does it make a difference?,” Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 875–903, 2009.

N. A. Rustan, R. Winarni, and S. Yamtinah, “Analysis of Science Process Skill on Science Learning in Primary School,” vol. 397, no. Icliqe 2019, pp. 679–687, 2020.

M. Pedaste, A. Baucal, and E. Reisenbuk, “Towards a science inquiry test in primary education: development of items and scales,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, 2021.

K. C. Suryandari, Rohkmaniyah, and M. Chamdani, “Analysis of student responses for scientific reading based project (SRBP) model: Using Rasch modeling,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 2194, no. December, 2019.

B. Archer-Kuhn, Y. Lee, J. Hewson, and V. Burns, “Growing together: cultivating inquiry-based learning in social work education,” Soc. Work Educ., vol. 00, no. 00, pp. 1–21, 2020.

T. O. Eng and Bibi Hazliana Mohd Hassan, “Penguasaan Kemahiran Proses sains asas Dalam Kalangan muriD seKolah renDah Di selangor,” J. Pendidik. Sains Mat. Malaysia, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 14, 2012.

& A. L. C. Edy H. M. Shahali1, Lilia Halim1, David F. Treagust2, Mihye Won2, “Primary School Teachers’ Understanding of Science Process Skills in Relation to their Teaching Qualifications and Teaching Experience,” Biomass Chem Eng, vol. 49, no. 23–6, pp. 1–22, 2015.




DOI: http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i4.21430

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science

International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE)
p-ISSN: 2252-8822, e-ISSN: 2620-5440

View IJERE Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.