Decision-Making Style Profiles of Pre-Service Biology Teachers in Socio-Scientific Issues

Marlina Ummas Genisa, Bambang Subali, Djukri Djukri, Habibi Habibi

Abstract


This study aims to describe the decision-making style regarding the socio-scientific issue (SSI) of pre-service Biology teachers in four regions of Indonesia as a guide in designing active, varied, and creative learning involving students in each learning session. Data were collected using a questionnaire to 514 participants and analyzed descriptively-quantitatively. The results show that each student's decision-making style is influenced by cognitive dimensions and processes during learning. Analytical decision-making styles also have a positive effect on gender, grade, region, and university. The description of these findings is discussed in this paper

Keywords


Socioscientific Issues; Decision-making; Pre-service teachers; Learning Design

References


Genisa, M. U., & Subali, B. (2020). Socio-Scientific Issues Implementation as Science Learning Material. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(2), 311-317.

Vincent-Ruz, P., & Schunn, C. D. (2018). The nature of science identity and its role as the driver of student choices. International journal of STEM education, 5(1), 48.

Zeidler, D. L., Herman, B. C., & Sadler, T. D. (2019). New directions in socioscientific issues research. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 1-9.

Fang, S. C., Hsu, Y. S., & Lin, S. S. (2019). Conceptualizing socioscientific decision making from a review of research in science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(3), 427-448..

Demiral, Ü., & Türkmenoğlu, H. (2018). The relationship of preservice science teachers’ decision making strategies and content knowledge in socio-scientific issues. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(1), 309-340.

Lieder, F., Griffiths, T. L., & Hsu, M. (2018). Overrepresentation of extreme events in decision making reflects rational use of cognitive resources. Psychological review, 125(1), 1.

Hamilton, K., Shih, S. I., & Mohammed, S. (2016). The development and validation of the rational and intuitive decision styles scale. Journal of personality assessment, 98(5), 523-535.

Klaczynski, P. A., & Cottrell, J. M. (2004). : A dual-process approach to cognitive development: The case of children's understanding of sunk cost decisions. Thinking & Reasoning, 10(2), 147-174.

Lund, E. S., Bråten, I., Brandmo, C., Brante, E. W., & Strømsø, H. I. (2019). Direct and indirect effects of textual and individual factors on source-content integration when reading about a socio-scientific issue. Reading and Writing, 32(2), 335-356..

Nygren, T. E., & White, R. J. (2002, September). Assessing individual differences in decision making styles: Analytical vs. intuitive. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 46, No. 12, pp. 953-957). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.

Cosku, Y. (2018). A Comparative Study on University Students' Rational and Experiential Thinking Styles in Terms of Faculty, Class Level and Gender Variables. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(9), 1863-1868..

Betsch, T., & Glöckner, A. (2010). Intuition in judgment and decision making: Extensive thinking without effort. Psychological Inquiry, 21(4), 279-294..

Sakschewski, M., Eggert, S., Schneider, S., & Bögeholz, S. (2014). Students’ Socioscientific Reasoning and Decision-making on Energy-related Issues—Development of a measurement instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 36(14), 2291-2313.

Gresch, H., Hasselhorn, M., & Bögeholz, S. (2013). Training in decision-making strategies: An approach to enhance students’ competence to deal with socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 35(15), 2587-2607.

Rachmatullah, A., & Ha, M. (2019). Examining high-school students’ overconfidence bias in biology exam: a focus on the effects of country and gender. International Journal of Science Education, 41(5), 652-673.

Chang, H. S., & Lee, H. J. (2010). College students' decision-making tendencies in the context of socioscientific issues (SSI). Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 30(7), 887-900.

Rizal, H. P., Siahaan, P., & Yuliani, G. (2017, February). Implementation of socio-scientific issues instruction to fostering students’ decision making based gender on environmental pollution. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 812, No. 012012, pp. 1-6).

Rizal, H. P., Yuliani, G., & Siahaan, P. (2019, April). The Relationship of Science Knowledge and Decision-Making Based on Gender on Socioscientific Issues. In 1st International Conference on Advanced Multidisciplinary Research (ICAMR 2018). Atlantis Press.

Almukhambetova, A., & Kuzhabekova, A. (2020). Factors affecting the decision of female students to enrol in undergraduate science, technology, engineering and mathematics majors in Kazakhstan. International Journal of Science Education, 1-21.

Saunders, K. J., & Rennie, L. J. (2013). A pedagogical model for ethical inquiry into socioscientific issues in science. Research in Science Education, 43(1), 253-274..

Liu, S. Y., Lin, C. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). College students' scientific epistemological views and thinking patterns in socioscientific decision making. Science Education, 95(3), 497-517.

Piatek-Jimenez, K., Cribbs, J., & Gill, N. (2018). College students’ perceptions of gender stereotypes: making connections to the underrepresentation of women in STEM fields. International Journal of Science Education, 40(12), 1432-1454.

Lee, Y. C., Grace, M., Rietdijk, W., & Lui, Y. C. (2019). A cross-cultural, cross-age, and cross-gender study of Hong Kong and UK secondary students' decision making about a biological conservation issue. International Journal of Science Education, 41(18), 2696-2715.

Ottander, C., & Ekborg, M. (2012). Students’ experience of working with socioscientific issues-a quantitative study in secondary school. Research in Science Education, 42(6), 1147-1163.

Arvai, J. L., Campbell, V. E., Baird, A., & Rivers, L. (2004). Teaching students to make better decisions about the environment: Lessons from the decision sciences. The Journal of Environmental Education, 36(1), 33-44.

Nygren, T. E., & White, R. J. (2005, September). Relating decision making styles to predicting selfefficacy and a generalized expectation of success and failure. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 432-434). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.

Böttcher, F., & Meisert, A. (2013). Effects of direct and indirect instruction on fostering decision-making competence in socioscientific issues. Research in Science Education, 43(2), 479-506..

Lundström, M. (2011). Decision-making in health issues. Teenagers’ use of science and other discourses.

Eastwood, J. L., Sadler, T. D., Zeidler, D. L., Lewis, A., Amiri, L., & Applebaum, S. (2012). Contextualizing nature of science instruction in socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(15), 2289-2315.

Jho, H., Yoon, H. G., & Kim, M. (2014). The relationship of science knowledge, attitude and decision making on socio-scientific issues: The case study of students’ debates on a nuclear power plant in Korea. Science & Education, 23(5), 1131-1151.

Lederman, N. G., Antink, A., & Bartos, S. (2014). Nature of science, scientific inquiry, and socio-scientific issues arising from genetics: A pathway to developing a scientifically literate citizenry. Science & Education, 23(2), 285-302.

Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). The significance of content knowledge for informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: Applying genetics knowledge to genetic engineering issues. Science education, 89(1), 71-93.

Sadler, T. D., Romine, W. L., & Topçu, M. S. (2016). Learning science content through socio-scientific issues-based instruction: A multi-level assessment study. International Journal of Science Education, 38(10), 1622-1635.

Gutierez, S. B. (2015). Integrating Socio-Scientific Issues to Enhance the Bioethical Decision-Making Skills of High School Students. International Education Studies, 8(1), 142-151.

Tal, T., & Kedmi, Y. (2006). Teaching socioscientific issues: Classroom culture and students’ performances. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(4), 615-644.

Reis, P., & Galvão, C. (2009). Teaching controversial socio-scientific issues in biology and geology classes: A case study. The Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education.

Kolstø, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science education, 85(3), 291-310.

Lindahl, B., Rosberg, M., Ekborg, M., Ideland, M., Malmberg, C., Rehn, A., ... & Winberg, M. (2011). Socio-Scientific Issues--A Way to Improve Students' Interest and Learning?. Online Submission.

Walker, K. A., & Zeidler, D. L. (2007). Promoting discourse about socioscientific issues through scaffolded inquiry. International journal of science education, 29(11), 1387-1410.

Ratcliffe, M. (1997). Pupil decision‐making about socio‐scientific issues within the science curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 167-182.

Sadler, T. D., Chambers, F. W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 387-409.

Lang, F., Kammerer, Y., Oschatz, K., Stürmer, K., & Gerjets, P. (2020). The role of beliefs regarding the uncertainty of knowledge and mental effort as indicated by pupil dilation in evaluating scientific controversies. International Journal of Science Education, 42(3), 350-371.

Lin, J. W., Cheng, T. S., Wang, S. J., & Chung, C. T. (2020). The effects of socioscientific issues web searches on grade 6 students’ scientific epistemological beliefs: the role of information positions. International Journal of Science Education, 1-20.

Cian, H. (2020). The influence of context: comparing high school students’ socioscientific reasoning by socioscientific topic. International Journal of Science Education, 1-19.

Sadler, T. D., Chambers, F. W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 387-409.

Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry?. Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371-391.

Yahaya, J. M., Nurulazam, A., & Karpudewan, M. (2016). College students’ attitudes towards sexually themed science content: a socioscientific issues approach to resolution. International Journal of Science Education, 38(7), 1174-1196.

Wang, H. H., Chen, H. T., Lin, H. S., Huang, Y. N., & Hong, Z. R. (2017). Longitudinal study of a cooperation-driven, socio-scientific issue intervention on promoting students’ critical thinking and self-regulation in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 39(15), 2002-2026.

Fowler, S. R., & Zeidler, D. L. (2016). Lack of evolution acceptance inhibits students’ negotiation of biology-based socioscientific issues. Journal of Biological Education, 50(4), 407-424.

Topçu, M. S., Foulk, J. A., Sadler, T. D., Pitiporntapin, S., & Atabey, N. (2018). The classroom observation protocol for socioscientific issue-based instruction: development and implementation of a new research tool. Research in Science & Technological Education, 36(3), 302-323.




DOI: http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i3.21376

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science

International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE)
p-ISSN: 2252-8822, e-ISSN: 2620-5440

View IJERE Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.