Challenges in using authentic assessment in 21st century ESL classrooms

Muhammad Noor Muhammad Noor, Nurahimah Mohd Yusoff, Mohd Faiz Mohd Yaakob


This paper seeks to explore the challenges faced by excellent teachers in preparing for authentic assessment in their ESL classrooms. This qualitative case study involving 6 excellent teachers was based on purposive sampling. Data sources in this study used classroom observation and a series of semi-structured interviews with the excellent teachers. Thematic analysis was used to identify emerging themes from the codes gathered from the interviews and observations. Data showed that excellent teachers faced multiple challenges prior to preparing for authentic assessment. They have also been using variations of authentic assessment to help children in their learning besides accurate documentation and extensive reading from around the globe to equip themselves with the current knowledge. Since there is no clear guideline for teachers who practice authentic assessment in their classes, this study provided some insights on the preparations and the use of authentic assessment as part of their teaching and learning process.


Excellent teachers, 21st-century assessment, Authentic assessment, Paragogy


Ahmad, S., & Mussawy, J. (2009). Assessment practices : Students’ and teachers’ perceptions of classroom assessment, 1–115.

Al-ruqeishi, M., & Al-humaidi, S. (2016). Alternative assessment as perceived by EFL teachers, XI(3), 88–102.

Amzat, I. H. (2017). Key performance indicators for excellent teachers in Malaysia : A measurement model for excellent teaching practices. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 66(3), 298–319.

Archbald, D. A., & Neumann Fred, M. (1988). Beyond standardized testing : Assessing authentic academic achievement in the secondary school. Washington, DC: National Association of Secondary School Principals.

Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member checking: A tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1802–1811.

Bohemia, E., & Davison, G. (2012). Authentic learning: The gift project. Design and Technology Education, 17, 49–61. Retrieved from

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. London: SAGE.

Bruce, B., Vicki, L., & Allen, J. P. (2012). Defining authentic classroom assessment : Practical assessment, research & evaluation, 17(2).

Campbell, A. (2010). Digital forms of assessment : Assessing what counts, the performance, 159–163.

Charin, C., Songsak, P., & Waro, P. (2015). Teachers development model to authentic assessment by empowerment evaluation approach. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(17), 2524–2530.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Fakhri, A. K., & Mohd Isa, A. (2016). Isu kesediaan guru dalam amalan melaksanakan pentaksiran berasaskan sekolah. EDUCATUM – Journal of Social Science, 2, 1–7.

Feldman, K. A. (2007). Identifying exemplentary teachers and teaching. Evidence from Student Ratings, 1–51.

Fitriani. (2014). The challenges in implementing authentic assessment in Curriculum 2013 (pp. 1151–1154).

Gibbs, G. (1995). How can promoting excellent teachers promote excellent teaching? Innovations in Education & Training International, 32(1), 74–81.

Herlo, D. (2014). Paragogy : A new theory in education. Journal Plus Education, 10(1), 35–41. Retrieved from

Herrington, J. (2007). Authentic learning supported by technology : 10 suggestions and cases of integration in classrooms, 44(3), 219–236.

Ho, T. N. (2015). An exploratory investigation of the practice of assessment for learning in Vietnamese higher education: Three case studies of lecturers’ practice. Retrieved from Nhat_Ho_Thesis.pdf

Hoque, K. E., Zabidi, A., & Zohora, M. F. (2012). Excellent teachers and their job satisfactions : An analysis at Malaysia’s standpoint. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 1(4), 1–16.

Keeley, J. W., Ismail, E., & Buskist, W. (2016). Excellent teachers’ perspectives on excellent teaching. Teaching of Psychology, 43(3), 175–179.

Koh, K. H. (2017). Authentic assessment, 1(October), 1–24.

Kricsfalusy, V., George, C., & Reed, M. G. (2018). Integrating problem and project-based learning opportunities: Assessing outcomes of a field course in environment and sustainability. Environmental Education Research, 24(4), 593–610.

Larkin, T. L. (2014). The student conference : A model of authentic assessment. In Talking about teaching (pp. 36–46).

Lee, Y., & Rofe, J. S. (2016). Paragogy and flipped assessment : Experience of designing and running a MOOC on research methods. Open Learning, 31(2), 116–129.

Lombardi, B. M. M. (2008). Making the grade : The role of assessment in authentic learning.

Lu, Y., & Gatua, M. W. (2014). Methodological considerations for qualitative research with immigrant populations: Lessons from two studies. Qualitative Report, 19(30), 1–16. Retrieved from

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2007). Terma dan rujukan guru cemerlang.

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2013). Malaysia education blueprint - 2013 - 2025. KPM.

Muhammad Noor & Nurahimah. (2016). Improving process writing with the use of authentic assessment. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 5(3), 200–204.

Muhammad Noor & Nurahimah. (2018). Experiences of using authentic assessment with English language young learners. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(9), 375–384.

Nasab, F. G. (2015). Alternative versus Traditional Assessment, 2(6), 165–178.

Noraini, Azliza, & Radha. (2013). Expertise in the classroom: The multiple roles of master teachers in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 89, 657–661.

Nurwahida, Dinuka, Xiang, L. W., & Syeda Fatima. (2017). Clerical work for school teachers : A burden or a responsibility? Journal of Humanities, Language, Culture and Business, 1(3), 26–36.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.

Razmawaty, M., & Othman, L. (2017). Authentic assessment in assessing higher order thinking skills, 7(2), 466–476.

Reeves, T. C. (2000). Alternatıve assessment approaches for onlıne, 23(1), 101–111.

Sammons, P., Lindorff, A. M., Ortega, L., & Kington, A. (2016). Inspiring teaching: Learning from exemplary practitioners. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 1(2), 124–144.

Sangmeister, J. (2017). Commercial competence : Comparing test results of paper‑ and‑pencil versus computer‑based assessments. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training.

Scott, G. W. (2017). Active engagement with assessment and feedback can improve group-work outcomes and boost student confidence. Higher Education Pedagogies, 2(1), 1–13.

Serin, G. (2015). Alternative assessment practices of a classroom teacher: Alignment with reform-based science curriculum. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(2), 277–297.

Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14.

Spiller, D. (2012). Assessment matters : Self-assessment and peer assessment. Teaching Development, (February).

Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Thomas, D. R., & Hodges, I. D. (2010). Designing and managing your research project : Core knowledge for social and health researchers. London: SAGE Publications.

Thornton, H. J. (2010). Excellent teachers leading the way: How to cultivate teacher leadership. Middle School Journal, 41(4), 36–43.

Van Viegen Stille, S., Jang, E., & Wagner, M. (2016). Building teachers’ assessment capacity for supporting English language learners through the implementation of the STEP language assessment in Ontario K-12 Schools. TESL Canada Journal, 32(9), 1.

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.

Total views : 32 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science

International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE)
p-ISSN: 2252-8822, e-ISSN: 2620-5440

View IJERE Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.