Teacher-Student Interaction In Mathematics Learning

Irma Ayuwanti, Marsigit Marsigit, Dwi Siswoyo


Teacher-students interaction is one of the most important interactions in learning. Teacher-students interaction affects student understanding.However, in practice, there are still many lessons that have not applied teacher-students interaction properly.This study aims to reveal teacher-student interaction in the mathematics learning process that affects students’ mathematical understanding.This study uses a qualitative method with a phenomenological approach.Theresearch subjects were eighth-grade junior high school students. Research data were obtained through observation, interviews, and documentation.Observations were conducted in the eighth grade and interviews were conducted with six students from the class. The students were interviewed to express their opinions concerning learning process interactions. The results of this study show that teacher-student interaction has affected students’ mathematical understanding consists of 1) the teacher transfers the material-the students attend to the material, 2) question-answer amid teacher-students, 3) the teacher makes interesting learning strategies-students are actively involved in learning, 4) teachers give awards-students receive awards.


Interaction; Teacher-Student Interaction; Mathematics Learning


S. D. Du Toit and G. F. Du Toit, “Learner metacognition and mathematics achievement during problem-solving in a mathematics classroom,” J. Transdiscipl. Res. South. Africa, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 505–518, 2013.

J. Hodaňová and D. Nocar, “Mathematics Importance in Our Life,” in INTED2016 Proceedings, 2016, vol. 1, no. March, pp. 3086–3092, doi: 10.21125/inted.2016.0172.

B. Raj Acharya, “Factors Affecting Difficulties in Learning Mathematics by Mathematics Learners,” Int. J. Elem. Educ., vol. 6, no. 2, p. 8, 2017, doi: 10.11648/j.ijeedu.20170602.11.

Kusmaryono and I, “The Importance Of Mathematical Power In Mathematics Learning,” in International Conference on Mathematics, Science, and Education 2014 (ICMSE 2014) THE, 2014, vol. 2014, no. Icmse.

I. Ayuwanti, Marsigit, and D. Siswoyo, “The development of fuzzy set theory in the field of health,” Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res., vol. 9, no. 4, 2020.

A. Hashmi and M. Saleem, “Diagnosis Blood Test for Liver Disease using Fuzzy Logic,” Int. J. Sci. Basic Appl. Res., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 151–183, 2015.

D. Kartika, R. L. Gema, and M. Pratiwi, “Expert Systems for Identifying Children ’ s Severe Malnutrition,” J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol., vol. 2, no. October, pp. 20–29, 2016.

A.R.Razak,“Interaksi Pembelajaran Efektif Untuk Berprestasi,” J.PILAR, vol. 2, no.2, pp.63–79, 2013.

I. V. S. Mullis, M. O. Martin, P. Foy, and A. Arora, Timss. 2015.

R. Rosnawati, “Kemampuan penalaran matematika siswa SMP Indonesia pada TIMSS 2011,” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Penerapan MIPA, 2013, pp. M–6.

R. Sidabutar, “The Efforts to Improve Mathematics Learning Achievement Results of High School Students as Required by Competency- Based Curriculum and Lesson Level-Based Curriculum,” J. Educ. Pract., vol. 7, no. 15, pp. 10–15, 2016.

S. D. Davadas and Y. F. Lay, “Factors affecting students’ attitude toward mathematics: A structural equation modeling approach,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 517–529, 2018, doi: 10.12973/ejmste/80356.

B. Apriliyanto, D. R. S. Saputro, and Riyadi, “Student’s social interaction in mathematics learning,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2018, vol. 983, no. 1, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012130.

P. Mccarthy, A. Sithole, P. Mccarthy, J.-P. Cho, and E. Gyan, “Teacher Questioning Strategies in Mathematical Classroom Discourse: A Case Study of Two Grade Eight Teachers in Tennessee, USA,” J. Educ. Pract. , vol. 7, no. 21, pp. 80–89, 2016.

B. C. D. Bruce, “Student Interaction in the Math Classroom : Stealing Ideas or Building Understanding,” Res.into Pract. Ontario Assoc. Deans Educ. Res. Monogr., no. January, pp. 1–4, 2007.

R. C. Pianta, “Teacher–Student Interactions,” Policy Insights from Behav. Brain Sci., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 98–105, 2016, doi: 10.1177/2372732215622457.

Georg Brutian, “METAPHILOSOPHY IN THE SYSTEMS OF METATHEORIES A,” Metaphilosophy, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 294–305, 2012.

R. Wikandaru, “Metafisika Informasi Dalam Perspektif Pemikiran Jean Baudrillard: Kontekstualisasinya Dengan Pertautan Media Dan Politik Di Indonesia,” J. Filsafat, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 264–289, 2018.

S. Nurdin, Ismail & Hartati, Metodologi penelitian sosial dan hukum. Surabaya: Media Sahabat Cendekia, 2019.

Y. C. Gencturk, “Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge For Teaching, Instructional Practices, And Student Outcomes,” University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, 2012.

M. Shahrill, “Review of teacher questioning in mathematics classrooms,” Artic. Int. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci., vol. 3, no. 17, 2013.

S. Papadakis, M. Kalogiannakis, and N. Zaranis, “Improving Mathematics Teaching in Kindergarten with Realistic Mathematical Education,” Early Child. Educ. J., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 369–378, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10643-015-0768-4.

M. Akiba and G. Liang, “Effects of teacher professional learning activities on student achievement growth,” J. Educ. Res., vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 99–110, 2016, doi: 10.1080/00220671.2014.924470.

Y. Copur-Gencturk, “The Effects of Changes in Mathematical Knowledge on Teaching: A Longitudinal Study of Teachers’ Knowledge and Instruction Yasemin,” J. Res. Math. Educ., vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 280–330, 2015.

W. Thalheimer, “The Learning Benefits of Questions,” Massachusetts, USA , Nov. 2014.

Z. F. Koçak, R. Bozan, and Ö. Işik, “The importance of group work in mathematics,” in Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2009, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 2363–2365, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.414.

L. Dong, W. T. Seah, and D. Clarke, “Pedagogical tensions in teacher’s questioning practices in the mathematics classroom: A case in mainland China,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 167–181, 2018, doi: 10.12973/ejmste/79630.

E. Afari, “Teaching mathematics in game learning environment,” Int. Rev. Contemp. Learn. Res., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 33–45, Sep. 2012, doi: 10.12785/irclr/010104.

L. Colgan, “WHAT WORKS? Research into Practice Making Math Children Will Love: Building Positive Mathitudes to Improve Student Achievement in Mathematics,” Ontario, 2014.

E. Sinay and A. Nahornick, “Teaching and Learning Mathematics Research Series l: Effective Instructional Strategies,” Canada, 2016.

M. Constantine, C. Musingafi, and K. E. Muranda, “Students and Questioning: A Review of the Role Played By Students Generated Questions in the Teaching and Learning Process,” Stud. Soc. Sci. Humanit., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 101–107, 2014.

J. Amanda Suyo Vega, M. Elisa Meneses La Riva, V. Hugo Fernández Bedoya, J. Luis Aníbal Baldárrago Baldárrago, and S. Edita Paredes Díaz, “Learning Strategies In Mathematics For The Participants Of An Alternative Basic Education Centre,” Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res., vol. 8, no. 11, 2019.

J. Di Fatta, B. A. S. Garcia, and B. S. S. Gorman, “Increasing Student Learning In Mathematics With The Use Of Collaborative Teaching Strategies,” Chicago, Illinois, May 2009.

C. Wegner, L. Minnaert, and F. Strehlke, “The importance of learning strategies and how the project ‘Kolumbus-Kids’ promotes them successfully,” 2013.

O. Isaiah and O. O. Mabel, “Effects of Corporal Punishment on Academic Attainment of Secondary School Students,” nternational J. Innov. Educ. , vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 125–134, 2018.

I. Ahmad, H. Said, and F. Khan, “Effect of corporal punishment on students’ motivation and classroom learning,” Rev. Eur. Stud., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 130–134, 2013, doi: 10.5539/res.v5n4p130.

L. Claudiu and C. Langa, “Rewards And Punishments Role In Teacher-Student Relationship From The Mentor’s Perspective,” Acta Didact. Napocensa, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 7–12, 2014.

M. I. Ilegbusi, “An Analysis Of The Role Of Rewards And Punishment In Motivating School Learning,” Inf. Syst. Dev. Informatics, vol. 4, no. 1, 2013.

M. Shahbaz Arif and M. Shaban Rafi, “Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama,” ournal Theory Pract. Educ., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 171–180, 2007.

D. Ghafoor Awan, “The Impact Of Corporal Punishment On Students’ Performance In Public Schools,” 2018.

G. S. Ching, “Looking into the issues of rewards and punishment in students,” Int. J. Res. Stud. Psychol., vol. 1, no. 2, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.5861/ijrsp.2012.v1i2.44.

McClean, “The Impact of Incentives and Rewards on Student Learning,” 2016.

E. Stan, “About Rules, Punishments and Rewards in Education,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 112, pp. 1160–1166, Feb. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1280.

M. Mosleh, M. Sapiyan Baba, and M. A. A. Mosleh, “Overview of Traditional Note Taking,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., pp. 1–28, 2013.

E. Surya and E. Novira Rizkinta, “Effect of Granting Reward on Learning Outcomes of Mathematics in Class IV of Public Primary School 014680of Buntu Pane,” Int. J. Sci. Basic Appl. Res., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 101–110, 2017.

S. Papadakis, M. Kalogiannakis, and N. Zaranis, “The effectiveness of computer and tablet assisted intervention in early childhood students’ understanding of numbers. An empirical study conducted in Greece,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1849–1871, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10639-018-9693-7.

S. Papadakis, M. Kalogiannakis, and N. Zaranis, “Comparing Tablets and PCs in teaching Mathematics: An attempt to improve Mathematics Competence in Early Childhood Education,” Presch. Prim. Educ., vol. 4, no. 2, p. 241, 2016, doi: 10.12681/ppej.8779.

DOI: http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.21184
Total views : 40 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science

International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE)
p-ISSN: 2252-8822, e-ISSN: 2620-5440

View IJERE Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.