Postgraduate Students’ Perspective on Supporting “Learning From Home” to Solve the COVID-19 Pandemics

Ihsana El Khuluqo


It is very important to study this topic because it is a novel education process applied in the postgraduate program in UHAMKA.  The objective of this present research was to reveal how the  postgraduate student perceive of or respond to the online learning process.  A mixed method  between qualitative and quantitative  ones was adopted in this present research. The research results showed that most students who had experienced of the online learning activities encountered some obstacles because they had never conducted “LFH (Learning From Home) activities before. The respondents were 428 postgraduate students who  actively joined in the “LFH” activities. From the students, 316 students used the platform zoom as the supporting application in the  LFH activities. The respondents filled in the Google Form, then the collected data could be quickly and accurately processed.  Other respondents preferred the google classroom, the whatsapp and other applications in following the learning  activities according to the agreement and features provided in each flat form. There were 408 respondents stating that there was a two-way communication between the lecturers and the students during the LFH activities. They stated that the limited Internet network  hindered  the online lecturing. Thirty one respondents declared that technology limitations  hampered  the online lecturing, and 105 students revealed  that it is the limitations in using the application that caused the online lecturing  to become obstacles


Covid-19; LFH; E-Learning


A Taxonomy of Factors to Promote Quality Web-Supported Learning 1 Jill W. Fresen (PhD), University of Pretoria, South Africa. (2007). 6(3), 351–362.

Alexander, B., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M. (2016). Digital Literacy An NMC Horizon Project Strategic Brief. Scientific American, 273(3), 190–205.

Allan, S. (2020). Migration and transformation: A sociomaterial analysis of practitioners’ experiences with online exams. Research in Learning Technology, 28(1063519), 1–14.

Arbaugh, J. B. (2000). Virtual Classroom Characteristics and Student Satisfaction with Internet-Based MBA Courses. Journal of Management Education, 24(1), 32–54.

Boud, D., & Soler, R. (2016). Sustainable assessment revisited. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 400–413.

Browne, C., Mendoza, A., Sindermann, A., & Holland, B. (2017). Students as Co-creators of an Online Learning Resource. Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 1(21).

Burnett, K., Bonnici, L. J., Miksa, S. D., & Kim, J. (2007). Frequency , Intensity and Topicality in Online Learning : An Exploration of the Interaction Dimensions that Contribute to Student Satisfaction in Online Learning. 48(1), 21–36.

Crawford-Ferre, Heather GlynnWiest, Lynda R. (2012). Effective Online Instruction in Higher Education. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 13(1), 11–14.

Darmayanti, T., Setiani, M. Y., & Oetojo, B. (2007). E-Learning pada pendidikan jarak jauh: konsep yang mengubah metode pembelajaran di perguruan tinggi di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Terbuka Dan Jarak Jauh, 8, 99–113.

Ferrell, G. (2014). Electronic Management of Assessment (EMA): a landscape review. August, 46.

Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Rogers, T., & Gasevic, D. (2016). Learning analytics should not promote one size fits all: The effects of instructional conditions in predicting academic success. Internet and Higher Education, 28(June 2019), 68–84.

Gelan, A., Fastré, G., Verjans, M., Martin, N., Janssenswillen, G., Creemers, M., Lieben, J., Depaire, B., & Thomas, M. (2018). Affordances and limitations of learning analytics for computer-assisted language learning: a case study of the VITAL project. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(3), 294–319.

Harasim, L. (2000). Harasim2000. 3, 41–61.

Herodotou, C., Zdrahal, Z., Rienties, B., Hlosta, M., Boroowa, A., & Naydenova, G. (2017). Implementing predictive learning analytics on a large scale: The teacher’s perspective. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, July 2018, 267–271.

Iqbal, M. J., & Ahmad, M. (2010). Enhancing quality of education through e-learning: The case study of Allama Iqbal Open University. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 11(1), 84–97.

Kim, K., Liu, S., & Bonk, C. J. (2005). Online MBA students ’ perceptions of online learning : Benefits , challenges , and suggestions. 8, 335–344.

Muller, K., Gradel, K., Forte, M., Mccabe, R., Pickett, A. M., Piorkowski, R., Scalzo, K., & Sullivan, R. (2019). Assessing Student Learning in the Online Modality. National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment (NILOA), 40, 1.

Nielsen, W., Hoban, G., & Hyland, C. J. T. (2017). Pharmacology students’ perceptions of creating multimodal digital explanations. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(2), 329–339.

Nugroho, A. (2012). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh Berbasis Web. Jurnal Transformatika, 9(2), 72.

Oliver, B., & Goerke, V. (2007). Australian undergraduates’ use and ownership of emerging technologies: Implications and opportunities for creating engaging learning experiences for the Net Generation. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(2), 171–186.

Palvia, S., Aeron, P., Gupta, P., Mahapatra, D., Parida, R., Rosner, R., & Sindhi, S. (2018). Online Education: Worldwide Status, Challenges, Trends, and Implications. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 21(4), 233–241.

Reyna, J., & Meier, P. (2020). Co-creation of knowledge using mobile technologies and digital media as pedagogical devices in undergraduate STEM education. Research in Learning Technology, 28(1063519), 1–14.

Rienties, B., & Toetenel, L. (2016). The impact of learning design on student behaviour, satisfaction and performance: A cross-institutional comparison across 151 modules. Computers in Human Behavior, 60(July), 333–341.

Sher, A. (2009). Assessing the relationship of student-instructor and student-student interaction to student learning and satisfaction in Web-based Online Learning Environment. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(2), 102–120.

Sorensen, C., & Baylen, D. M. (1999). Interaction in Interactive Television Instruction: Perception versus Reality. 1999 Conference of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Montreal, Canada, 150.

Study, A. C. (2009). Utilizing Online Exams : 6(8), 1–8.

Sun, A., & Chen, X. (2016). Online education and its effective practice: A research review. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 15(2016), 157–190.

Tait, A. (2018). Open Universities: the next phase. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 13(1), 13–23.

Uri, E. (2005). Conditions Under Which Assessment Supports Students ’ Learning.

Weller, M. (2007). The distance from isolation. Why communities are the logical conclusion in e-learning. Computers and Education, 49(2), 148–159.

Total views : 11 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science

International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE)
p-ISSN: 2252-8822, e-ISSN: 2620-5440

View IJERE Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.