### Reviewing the van Hiele Model and Metacognition on Geometric Thinking Development

#### Abstract

Geometric thinking is the ability to think about the relationship between attributes of geometrical shape. Meanwhile, metacognition is the ability to think about thinking. The intervention of the van Hiele model in learning geometry has been practiced as well as metacognition. However, studies on the van Hiele model and metacognition on geometric thinking are still under-researched. This systematic review study aims to review the articles regarding the van Hiele model and metacognition for geometric thinking development. The keywords used related to the van Hiele model, metacognition, and geometric thinking was carried out through internet search engines. Several existing articles had been surveyed from 1995 to 2020. The result showed that most articles reviewed indicated the development of geometric thinking by using the van Hiele model and metacognition. It also seems that the potential of application of the van Hiele model and metacognition can strengthen the students’ geometric thinking development.

#### Keywords

#### References

J. Van de Walle, “Geometric thinking and geometric concepts,” in Elementary and Middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally., vol. 4th, 2004, pp. 306–312.

M. L. Crowley, “The van Hiele model of the development of geometric thought,” Learn. Teach. Geom. K-12, pp. 1–16, 1987, Accessed: May 06, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://www.csmate.colostate.edu/docs/math/mathactivities/june2007/The van Hiele Model of the Development of Geometric Thought.pdf.

Z. Usiskin, “Van Hiele Levels and Achievement in Secondary School Geometry,” 1982. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.

D. H. Clements and M. T. Battista, “Geometry and Spatial Reasoning,” in D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, New York: Macmillan, 1992, pp. 420–464.

R. B. Armah, P. O. Cofie, and C. A. Okpoti, “Investigating the effect of van hiele phase-based instruction on pre-service teachers’ geometric thinking,” Int. J. Res. Educ. Sci., vol. 4, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.21890/ijres.383201.

R. A. Wahab, A. H. Abdullah, M. Mokhtar, N. A. Atan, and M. S. Abu, “Evaluation by Experts and Designated Users on the Learning Strategy using SketchUp Make for Elevating Visual Spatial Skills and Geometry Thinking,” Bolema Bol. Educ. Matemática, vol. 31, no. 58, pp. 819–840, Aug. 2017, doi: 10.1590/1980-4415v31n58a15.

P. M. van Hiele, “Developing Geometric Thinking through Activities That Begin with Play,” in Teaching Children Mathematics, NCTM, 1999, pp. 310–316.

J. H. Flavell, “Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry,” Am. Psychol., vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 906–911, 1979, doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.34.10.906.

OECD, “The effects of metacognitive instruction on achievement,” 2014.

S. Mandaci Şahin and F. Kendir, “The Effect of Using Metacognitive Strategies for Solving Geometry Problems on Students’ Achievement and Attitude.,” Educ. Res. Rev., vol. 8, no. 19, pp. 1777–1792, 2013, doi: 10.5897/ERR2013.1578.

S. Miller and S. William, “The Impact of Metacognitive Teaching Strategies on Learners’ Performance in Earth Geometry: A Case Study of Mubanga Secondary School,” Int. J. Res. Innov. Soc. Sci., vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 2454–6186, 2019, Accessed: May 11, 2020. [Online]. Available: www.rsisinternational.org.

D. Patkin and Y. Sarfaty, “The Effect of Solid Geometry Activities of Pre-service Elementary School Mathematics Teachers on Concepts Understanding and Mastery of Geometric Thinking Levels,” J. Korean Soc. Math. Educ. Ser. D Res. Math. Educ., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 31–50, 2012.

L. Finnell, “Metacognition and the van Hiele model of thinking in geometry,” Georgia State University, 1992.

A. Rofii, S. Sunardi, and M. Irvan, “Characteristics of Students’ Metacognition Process At Informal Deduction Thinking Level in Geometry Problems,” Int. J. Emerg. Math. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 89, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.12928/ijeme.v2i1.7684.

Ö. Şefik, S. Urhan, and N. Sezen-Yüksel, “Analysis of metacognitive skills and Van Hiele levels of geometric thinking through various variables,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, 2018, vol. 2037, p. 020024, doi: 10.1063/1.5078479.

A. Siddaway, “What is a systematic literature review and how do I do one,” University of Stirling. pp. 1–13, 2014.

S. Keele, “Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering.” academia.edu, 2007, [Online]. Available: http://www.academia.edu/download/35830450/2_143465389588742151.pdf.

C. Hart, “Doing A Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination.” SAGE Publications, 2018.

A. H. Abdullah and E. Zakaria, “Enhancing Students’ Level of Geometric Thinking Through Van Hiele’s Phase-based Learning,” Indian J. Sci. Technol., vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1–15, 2013.

A. S. Md. Yunus, A. F. Mohd Ayub, and T. T. Hock, “Geometric Thinking of Malaysian Elementary School Students,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1095–1112, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.29333/iji.2019.12170a.

D. Argaswari, “Development of Module of Leanring Geometry Based on Van Hiele Theory,” J. Daya Mat., vol. 6, no. 3, p. 276, 2019, doi: 10.26858/jds.v6i3.8528.

J. K. Alex and K. J. Mammen, “Lessons Learnt from Employing van Hiele Theory Based Instruction in Senior Secondary School Geometry Classrooms,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 2223–2236, 2016, doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2016.1228a.

M. N. Hassan, A. H. Abdullah, and N. Ismail, “Effects of VH-iSTEM Learning Strategy on Basic Secondary School Students’ Degree of Acquisition of van Hiele Levels of Thinking in Sokoto State, Nigeria,” Univers. J. Educ. Res., vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 4213–4223, 2020, doi: 10.13189/ujer.2020.080948.

L. Adulyasas, “Transferring Van Hiele Phase based Earning to the Tablet Application for Enhancing Secondary Student’s Geometric Thinking,” J. Adv. Res. Dyn. Control Syst., vol. 12, no. SP4, pp. 8–15, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.5373/JARDCS/V12SP4/20201460.

R. A. Wahab, A. H. Abdullah, M. S. Abu, N. A. Atan, M. Mokhtar, and M. H. Hamzah, “A Learning 3D Geometry through Sketchup Make (SPPD-SUM) to Enhance Visual Spatial Skills and the Level of Geometric Thinking,” J. Fundam. Appl. Sci., vol. 10, no. 6S, pp. 1005–1039, 2018, doi: 10.4314/jfas.v10i1s.36.

G. R. Kekana, “Using GeoGebra in transformation geometry: an investigation based on the Van Hiele model,” University of Pretoria, 2016.

M. Škrbec and T. H. Čadež, “Identifying and Fostering Higher Levels of Geometric Thinking,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 601–617, Jun. 2015, doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2015.1339a.

C. Markopoulos, D. Potari, W. Boyd, Κ. Petta, and M. Chaseling, “The Development of Primary School Students’ 3D Geometrical Thinking within a Dynamic Transformation Context,” Creat. Educ., vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 1508–1522, 2015, doi: 10.4236/ce.2015.614151.

M. B. Akgül, “The Effect of Using Dynamic Geometry Software on Eight Grade Students’ Achievement in Transformation Geometry, Geometric Thinking and Attitudes Toward Mathematics and Technology,” Middle East Technical University, 2014.

A. H. Abdullah and E. Zakaria, “The Effects of Van Hiele’s Phases of Learning Geometry on Students’ Degree of Acquisition of Van Hiele Levels,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 102, pp. 251–266, Nov. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.740.

N. M. Siew, C. L. Chong, and M. R. Abdullah, “Facilitating Students’ Geometric Thinking Through Van Hiele’s Phase-Based Learning Using Tangram,” J. Soc. Sci., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 101–111, 2013, doi: 10.3844/jsssp.2013.101.111.

P. G. Tieng and L. K. Eu, “Improving Students’ Van Hiele Level Of Geometric Thinking Using Geometer’s Sketchpad,” Malaysian Online J. Educ. Technol., vol. 2, no. 3, 2013, Accessed: May 08, 2017. [Online]. Available: www.mojet.net.

M. S. Abu and Z. Z. Abidin, “Improving the Levels of Geometric Thinking of Secondary School Students Using Geometry Learning Video based on Van Hiele Theory,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 16–22, 2013, Accessed: Aug. 07, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://iaesjournal.com/online/index.php/IJERE.

C. C. Meng and L. C. Sam, “Enhancing primary pupils’ geometric thinking through phase-based instruction using the Geometer’s Sketchpad,” Asia Pacific J. Educ. Educ., vol. 28, pp. 33–51, 2013.

A. H. Abdullah and E. Zakaria, “The Effects of Van Hiele’s Phase-Based Instruction Using the Geometer’s Sketchpad (GSP) on Students’ Levels of Geometric Thinking,” Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 1652–1660, 2013.

C. C. Meng and N. Idris, “Enhancing Students’ Geometric Thinking and Achievement in Solid Geometry,” J. Math. Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 15–33, 2012.

N. Idris, “The Impact of Using Geometers ’ Sketchpad on Malaysian Students ’ Achievement and Van Hiele Geometric Thinking,” J. Math. Educ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 94–107, 2009, Accessed: Apr. 09, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://www.educationforatoz.com/images/_9734_8_Noraini.pdf.

C. C. Meng, “Enhancing Students’ Geometric Thinking Through Phase-Based Instruction Using Geometer’S Sketchpad : a Case Study,” J. Pendidik dan Pendidik., vol. 24, pp. 89–107, 2009.

A. H. Abdullah and M. Mohamed, “The Use of Interactive Geometry Software (IGS) to Develop Geometric Thinking,” J. Teknol., vol. 49, pp. 93–107, 2008.

N. Idris, “The effect of geometers’ sketchpad on the performance in geometry of Malaysian students’ achievement and their van Hiele geometric thinking,” Malaysian J. Math. Sci., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 169–180, 2007, Accessed: Mar. 27, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://einspem.upm.edu.my/journal/fullpaper/vol1no2/2. MJMS vo 1(2) page 169-180.pdf.

K. E. Chang, Y. T. Sung, and S. Y. Lin, “Developing geometry thinking through multimedia learning activities,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 2212–2229, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2006.03.007.

N. Idris, “The Effect of Geometers Sketchpad on the Performance in Geometry of Malaysian Students’ Achievement and van hiele Geometry Thinking,” Malaysian J. Math. Sci., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 169–180, 2007.

M. Abidin, Z. Ismail, and N. Ismail, “Geometrical Thinking with Technology: A Systematic Literature Review,” in 2018 IEEE 10th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED), Nov. 2018, pp. 230–235, doi: 10.1109/ICEED.2018.8626949.

G. Keren and M. Fridin, “Kindergarten Social Assistive Robot (KindSAR) for children’s geometric thinking and metacognitive development in preschool education: A pilot study,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 35, pp. 400–412, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.009.

F. F. Firmansyah, B. E. Aribowo, R. Damayanti, M. P. Sari, Sunardi, and E. Yudianto, “The matthayom and senior high school student’s metacognition profile on solving pisa test shape and space content based on van hiele level,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1563, p. 012049, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1563/1/012049.

DOI: http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.21185

### Refbacks

- There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science

**International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE)**p-ISSN: 2252-8822, e-ISSN: 2620-5440

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.