The Effect of Coupled Inquiry-5E in Enhancing the Understanding of Meiosis Concept

NOORAIDA YAKOB, Kelvineh Kaliun, Ahmad Muslihin Ahmad, Rabiatul Adawiah Ahmad Rashid, Amelia Abdullah

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of coupled inquiry-5E approach on the understanding of meiosis concept among pre-service teachers.  The research design of this study is one-group design with a pre-test – post-test - delayed post-test.  A total of 31 pre-service teachers from one public university involved in this study.  An instrument, Meoisis Conceptual Test adapted from Saadah (2008) with 19 items was used.  Data was analysed using One Way Repeated Measure ANOVA.  The result showed that there is a statistically significant effect for time, Wilks’ Lambda =.80, F (2,29) = 3.65, p<.05, multivariate eta squared = .20.  From the analysis, it can be concluded that there is a statistically significant effect for time. Thus, this finding showed that couple inquiry learning approach has an effect on enhancing meiosis understanding among pre-service teachers.  From this study, it is suggested that couple inquiry learning approach is a good method to be used in learning abstract concept such as meiosis.

Keywords


Couple Inquiry; Meiosis Understanding; pre-service teacher

References


Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2011). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 1.

Aziz, N., & Ami Norliyana, S. K. (2011). Tahap pemahaman pelajar terhadap konsep Pembahagian Sel dalam mata pelajaran Biologi KBSM tingkatan empat. Not published. From: http://eprints.utm.my/11220/1/Tahap_Pemahaman_Pelajar_Terhadap_Konsep_Pembahagian_Sel_Dalam_Mata_Pelajaran_Biologi_KBSM_Tingkatan_Empat.pdf.

Baeten, M., Kyndt, E., Struyven, K., & Dochy, F. (2010). Using Student-Centred Learning Environments to Stimulate Deep Approaches to Learning: Factors Encouraging or Discouraging Their Effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 5, 243–260. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.06.001

Bybee, R. W. (2009). The BSCS 5E instructional model and 21st century skills. Colorado Springs: BSCS.

Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness.

Chattopadhyay, A. (2012). Understanding of Mitosis and Meiosis in Higher Secondary Students of Northeast India and the Implications for Genetics Education. Education, 2(3), 41-47.

Çimer, A. (2012). What makes biology learning difficult and effective: Students’ views. Educational Research and Reviews, 7(3), 61-71.

Cohen , J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological bulletin, 112(1), 155-159.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research method in education (5th ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.

Curriculum Development Center. (2005). Curriculum Specifications Biology Form 4, Integrated Curriculum for Secondary Schools.: Ministry of Education Malaysia.

Dikmenli , M. (2010). Misconceptions of cell division held by student teachers in biology: A drawing analysis. Scientific Research and Essays, 5(2), 235-247.

Dikmenli, M. (2010). Misconceptions of cell division held by student teachers in biology: A drawing analysis.

Dunkhase, J. A. (2003). The Coupled-Inquiry Cycle: A Teacher Concerns-based Model for Effective Student Inquiry. Science Educator, 12(1), 10-15.

Duran, M., & Dökme, İ. (2016). The effect of the inquiry-based learning approach on student's critical-thinking skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(12), 2887-2908. doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2016.02311a

Gass, S., Mackey, A., & Ross‐Feldman, L. (2005). Task‐based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Language learning, 55(4), 575-611.

Guzzetti B., Taylor,T.E, Glass, G.V. and Gammas, W.S. (1993). Promoting conceptual change in science: A comparative meta-analysis of instructional interventions from reading education and science education. Reading Research Quarterly 28:117–159

Marshall, J. C. (2013). Succeeding with inquiry in science and math classrooms. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Maxwell, D. O., Lambeth, D. T., & Cox, J. T. (2015). Effects of using inquiry-based learning on science achievement for fifth-grade students. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning & Teaching, 16(1), 106-136.

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2005). Integrated Curriculum for Secondary Schools, Curriculum Specifications, Biology Form 4. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia.

Minstrell, J., & Van Zee, E. (2000). Teaching in the inquiry-based science classroom. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Neik, T.X., Song, B.K. and Davidson, P. (2016). Popularity of Various Teaching Methods in A Post-Secondary Biology Class in a Malaysian Private Institution. Asian Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. 8(1), 1-25.

Newman, D. L., Catavero, C. M., & Wright, L. K. (2012). Students fail to transfer knowledge of chromosome structure to topics pertaining to cell division. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 11(4), 425-436.

Ozcan, T., Yildirim, O., & Ozgur, S. (2012). Determining of the university freshmen students’ misconceptions and alternative conceptions about mitosis and meiosis. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3677-3680.

Öztap, H., Ozay, E and Oztap, F. (2003). Teaching cell division to secondary school students: an investigation of difficulties experienced by Turkish teachers, Journal of Biological Education, 38:1, 13-15, DOI: 10.1080/00219266.2003.9655890. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2003.9655890

Perkins, D., & Blythe, T. (1994). Putting understanding up front. Educational Leadership, 51(5), 4-7.

Puspitasari, D. A., & Nasrudin, H. (2012). Increasing of Critical Thinking Skills Using Inquiry Learning Model in Sub Material Solubility and Solubility Product in Grade XI RSBI Senior High School 1 Bojonegoro. Unesa Journal of Chemical Education, 1(1), 76-82.

Sadiah, B. (2008). Kesan paduan kitar pembelajaran dan pemetaan konsep terhadap konsepsi pelajar tentang pembahagian sel. (PhD PhD Thesis), Universiti Sains Malaysia.

Sesli, E., & Kara, Y. (2012). Development and application of a two-tier multiple-choice diagnostic test for high school students’ understanding of cell division and reproduction. Journal of Biological Education, 46(4), 214-225.

Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., Hanley, P., & Thurston, A. (2014). Experimental evaluations of elementary science programs: A best‐evidence synthesis. Journal of research in Science Teaching, 51(7), 870-901.

Tanner, K. and Allen, D. (2004). Approaches to biology teaching and learning: learning styles and the problem of instructional selection--engaging all students in science courses. Cell Biology Education, Winter; 3(4), 197-201.

Williams, M., DeBarger, A. H., Montgomery, B. L., Zhou, X., & Tate, E. (2012). Exploring Middle School Students' Conceptions of the Relationship between Genetic Inheritance and Cell Division. Science Education, 96(1), 78-103.

Yakışan, M. (2016). Are the Genetic Materials of Gametes and Somatic Cells Different? The Conceptions of Pre-Service Teachers. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(4), 409-420. doi: 10.12973/ijese.2016.328a.




DOI: http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i1.20393
Total views : 31 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science

International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE)
p-ISSN: 2252-8822, e-ISSN: 2620-5440

View IJERE Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.